2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02323-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Compare and Evaluate Laryngeal Changes in Patients with Dysphonia in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) before and after Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) and Prokinetic Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Belafsky et al reported that RFS > 7 has a 95% predictive value for LPR 40 . Various studies have further reported RFS to correlate well with RSI in monitoring the response to anti‐reflux therapy 61–63 . In our study, 14 (58.3%) patients with LPR indicated by RFS also had GERD confirmed by 24‐h esophageal pH monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Belafsky et al reported that RFS > 7 has a 95% predictive value for LPR 40 . Various studies have further reported RFS to correlate well with RSI in monitoring the response to anti‐reflux therapy 61–63 . In our study, 14 (58.3%) patients with LPR indicated by RFS also had GERD confirmed by 24‐h esophageal pH monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…40 Various studies have further reported RFS to correlate well with RSI in monitoring the response to anti-reflux therapy. [61][62][63] In our study, 14 (58.3%) patients with LPR indicated by RFS also had GERD confirmed by 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. This supports the likelihood of LPR in post-irradiated patients with NPC, which has been under attention in the past.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%