Building on previous linguistic evaluations of media awards the present study uses integrative complexity (IC)-a rhetorical construct and psycholinguistic variable-to explore Nickelodeon's Kids' Choice Awards (KCAs), comparing the dialogue from the winners and nominees. The KCAs represent a unique opportunity for study because (a) although not viewed as prestigious as other awards (e.g., the Academy Awards or Golden Globes), they occupy an established space of cultural relevance, and (b) unlike most media awards, they prioritize kids, who form the voter base. Focusing specifically on the film categories, statistical analysis found significant negative relationships between IC and winning. These results reflect the findings from previous research, indicating that IC meaningfully predicts outcomes for media awards and that a shared psychology in terms of linguistic perception and how it relates to winning media awards may exist. In conjunction with previous research, the present study's results overall suggest that IC has a place within predictive models used to assess and evaluate entertainment media.