To be or not to be consistent? The role of friendship and group‐targeted perspective in managers' allocation decisions

Abstract

Summary Adopting a justice enactment perspective, we explore managers' consistent versus inconsistent application of existing rules in allocation decisions. We propose that when managers form friendship relationships with their employees, they are likely to experience greater tensions when fulfilling their managerial duties as resource allocators. On the one hand, managers may wish to deviate from the rules to benefit an employee who is also a friend. On the other hand, benefiting one employee (but not others) might lead to tensions in managers' friendships with other employees. We further argue that the extent to which managers adopt a group‐targeted perspective affects the resolution of this tension such that, from such a perspective, they are more likely to perceive consistent application of existing rules (vs. deviating from them) as fairer. We find support for our predictions across a field study and an experimental study. We discuss implications of our findings for literatures on justice enactment, allocation decisions, and workplace friendships.

How Relational Conflict Harms Family Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Family Social Capital and the Moderating Role of Family Ownership

“…An online questionnaire was prepared in Qualtrics and distributed through Prolific Academic (e.g., Derfler-Rozin et al, 2021 ) to managers of small and medium-sized family firms in the United States. The choice of the data collection method builds on the fact that online panel data has been increasingly used in recent years (Porter et al, 2019 ) while providing results that converge to conventional datasets in terms of data quality (Walter et al, 2019 ).…”

It’s not only what you do, but why you do it: How managerial motives influence employees’ fairness judgments.

“…Future research should also examine how a supervisor's motives impact justice and fairness judgments within a group. For instance, it may be that a prosocially motivated supervisor violates rules of justice toward one employee to fulfill rules of justice toward another (cf., Derfler-Rozin et al, 2020). Indeed, research has suggested that feelings of empathy could lead those in authority to provide some employees with preferential treatment, though this effect tended to disappear when the decision-maker felt accountable to the group (Blader & Rothman, 2014).…”

Defining Post-Pandemic Work and Organizations: The Need for Team Belongingness and Trust

“…In the early modernist workplace, friendships were likely formed through mutual self-disclosure [21] and perceived similarity [22]. This likely took place in overtime work meetings, the "knock-off drinks," and the indirect or direct benefits attached to physical and proximal workplace connections (e.g., preferential application of existing rules [21]). Contemporary technologies affect this.…”