To Be Continued

Guay, Alexandre; Pradeu, Thomas

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199382514.003.0017

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En primer lugar, señalar que se trata de una caracterización relacional y procesual del organismo, lo cual implica una toma de distancia respecto al sustancialismo como marco metafísico para conceptualizar los entes biológicos. Esta idea, defendida hoy en día por diversos especialistas (Ingold 2012;Guay y Pradeu 2015;Dupré 2012Dupré , 2021, se expresa bien en la siguiente imagen que proporciona Dupré:…”

Section: Ecologíaunclassified

Animales relacionales: la concepción heideggeriana del organismo biológico en los Grundbegriffe de 1929

Vila

2023

CRHF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En este trabajo ofrezco una interpretación de la concepción heideggeriana del organismo biológico presente en sus cursos de 1929. Para ello, primero enmarcaré la discusión dentro de la interpretación heideggeriana del naturalismo y su manera de entender la relación entre filosofía y ciencia. Luego, analizaré su interpretación de la embriología y la ecología mediante la cual Heidegger esboza aportes originales a la filosofía de la biología, especialmente en torno al problema de la identidad del organismo biológico. Finalmente, mostraré cómo esta interpretación supone una profunda crítica a las concepciones sustancialistas del organismo a favor de una concepción relacional y procesual.

show abstract

Section: Ecologíaunclassified

Animales relacionales: la concepción heideggeriana del organismo biológico en los Grundbegriffe de 1929

Vila

2023

CRHF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Robert Guay shares Ridley's position, going so far as to argue that the need for a social context in order to make meaning entails that 'There is no contest in Nietzsche between the lonely individual and the tyrannical crowd'. 17 Ridley and Guay claim that the conventions through which one acts and realizes one's freedom are, for Nietzsche, necessarily public, but this is not the whole story. For Nietzsche, we need social practices for our actions to make sense, but in order to be free we also need in some sense to set ourselves outside them, creating our own, individual practices and ways of giving meaning.…”

Section: Part 1: the Self In Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

A human cry

Ezekiel

2013

Philosophy & Social Criticism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is concerned with what Nietzsche claims about particular kinds of suffering that can emerge in encounters with others. I maintain that, even taking into account statements of Nietzsche’s that contradict or modify his language of solitude, hardness and domination, his acknowledgement of the capacity of witnessing others’ suffering to cause pain does not indicate an intersubjective notion of self-affirmation, but is an instance of a tension he identifies between our inescapable implication in social ways of being, and our need to create ourselves independently to overcome self-alienation. I argue that Nietzsche’s claims about pity are a particular instance of this tension – that is, that while he recognizes that we feel pity, he treats this as an unfortunate affect to be overcome, to be appropriated on an individual basis, rather than as an invitation to be authentically with others – as indicating the possibility of a mutual project of self-affirmation.

show abstract

“…The notions of identity , individuality and indistinguishability play crucial roles in philosophy, physics and mathematics [1,2]. 1 Whereas identity can be understood as a logical notion associated with the reflexive character of the relation of equality defined by the equal sign =, individuality is a more philosophical notion that makes reference to the fact that an individual entity is, in Lowe’s terms, ‘the single object that it is [⋯] distinct from others’ [3, p. 75].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identity, individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics

Catren

2023

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this brief survey, we discuss some of the scientific and philosophical problems and debates that underlie the notions of identity , individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics. We critically analyse the different positions for or against the existence of indistinguishable objects in different scientific theories, notably quantum mechanics and gauge theories in physics and homotopy type theory in mathematics. We argue that the different forms of indistinguishability that occur in many areas of physics and mathematics—far from being a problem to be eradicated—exhibit a rich formal structure that plays a key role in the corresponding theories that needs to be properly understood. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Identity, individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics’.

show abstract

To Be Continued

Cited by 12 publications

References 26 publications

Animales relacionales: la concepción heideggeriana del organismo biológico en los Grundbegriffe de 1929

Animales relacionales: la concepción heideggeriana del organismo biológico en los Grundbegriffe de 1929

A human cry

Identity, individuality and indistinguishability in physics and mathematics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About