2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“TNOs are Cool”: A survey of the trans-Neptunian region

Abstract: The goal of this work is to determine the physical characteristics of resonant, detached and scattered disk objects in the trans-Neptunian region, observed mainly in the framework of the “TNOs are Cool” Herschel open time key programme. Based on thermal emission measurements with the Herschel/PACS and Spitzer/MIPS instruments, we determine size, albedo, and surface thermal properties for 23 objects using radiometric modeling techniques. This is the first analysis in which the physical properties of objects in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For three of our targets the estimated Jacobi ellipsoid densities are in the order of ∼0.5 g cm −3 (ρ JE = 0.54, 0.39 and 0.48 g cm −3 for 2002 KY 14 , 2009 YD 7 and 2016 AE 193 , respectively, see Table 3), inside the range expected for smaller (D < 500 km) transneptunian objects and Centaurs (Grundy et al, 2019;Kiss et al, 2019). The Jacobi ellipsoid density estimates are, on the other hand, notably lower for 2012 VU 85 , 2017 CX 33 and 2013 PH 44 (ρ JE < 0.1 g cm −3 ), outside the range of densities plausibly considered, indicating that the light curves in these cases cannot be explained by equlibirium figures of rotating strengthless bodies.…”
Section: Rotating Elongated Bodies Versus Binaritymentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For three of our targets the estimated Jacobi ellipsoid densities are in the order of ∼0.5 g cm −3 (ρ JE = 0.54, 0.39 and 0.48 g cm −3 for 2002 KY 14 , 2009 YD 7 and 2016 AE 193 , respectively, see Table 3), inside the range expected for smaller (D < 500 km) transneptunian objects and Centaurs (Grundy et al, 2019;Kiss et al, 2019). The Jacobi ellipsoid density estimates are, on the other hand, notably lower for 2012 VU 85 , 2017 CX 33 and 2013 PH 44 (ρ JE < 0.1 g cm −3 ), outside the range of densities plausibly considered, indicating that the light curves in these cases cannot be explained by equlibirium figures of rotating strengthless bodies.…”
Section: Rotating Elongated Bodies Versus Binaritymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The binary separation, a bin is obtained from Kepler's third law, assuming a density of 0.7 g cm −3 to obtain the mass, characteristic for 10-100 km-sized Kuiper belt bodies and Centaurs (see e.g. Grundy et al, 2019;Kiss et al, 2019, for a latest compilation of Kuiper belt densities). The densities estimated for Ceto-Phorcys (ρ = 1.37 +0.66 −0.32 g cm −3 and Typhon-Echinda (ρ = 0.44 +0.44 −0.17 g cm −3 Grundy et al, 2008) are at the lower/upper extremes of the densities of ∼100 km-sized objects, and therefore may not be representative for the whole population.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Potential Binaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 lists the main orbital elements obtained from the JPL Horizons service (Giorgini et al 1996), as well as the dynamical group or mean-motion resonance of the target, the (Lellouch et al 2013;Vilenius 2014;Farkas-Takács et al 2020). When no radiometric size estimate was found, we used the H V absolute magnitude of the object (also listed in Table 5), assuming a geometric albedo of P V = 0.12 for cold classicals, which are predominantly red objects with relatively high albedos, and P V = 0.08 for all other dynamical groups (Farkas-Takács et al 2020;Lacerda et al 2014). The diameter is calculated as…”
Section: Appendix a Basic Tables Of K2 Tno Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…https://astroarchive.noirlab.edu/ 15 https://noirlab.edu/science/documents/scidoc049316 As shown inFarkas-Takács et al (2020), among other results, TNOs may have albedos that range from 3% to 30% (ignoring the high albedos of the very largest TNOs, which are very unlikely to be present in our sample). The albedo assumption of 10% used here simply allows us to estimate our required depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%