The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TNM staging of pancreatic carcinoma using helical CT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
51
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed that in 86% of pN1 patients no lymph node was larger than 10 mm and the majority of nodes were smaller than 5 mm , whereas in 46% of pN0 patients at least one lymph node was larger than or equal 10 mm. This reflects the reported sensitivity and specificity of CT scan in the assessment of nodal metastases in pancreatic cancer which ranges from 14% to 37% and from 60% to 92% respectively 8,9,[14][15][16] . The lack of correlation between lymph node size and metastatic infiltration has also been reported for other solid tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study showed that in 86% of pN1 patients no lymph node was larger than 10 mm and the majority of nodes were smaller than 5 mm , whereas in 46% of pN0 patients at least one lymph node was larger than or equal 10 mm. This reflects the reported sensitivity and specificity of CT scan in the assessment of nodal metastases in pancreatic cancer which ranges from 14% to 37% and from 60% to 92% respectively 8,9,[14][15][16] . The lack of correlation between lymph node size and metastatic infiltration has also been reported for other solid tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the pretherapeutic lymph node staging of pancreatic cancer, a correlation between lymph node size and metastatic infiltration is assumed. Most investigators have used short axis diameter of 10 mm for diagnosing nodal involvement 8,9,16,17 . Our study showed that in 86% of pN1 patients no lymph node was larger than 10 mm and the majority of nodes were smaller than 5 mm , whereas in 46% of pN0 patients at least one lymph node was larger than or equal 10 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Компьютерная томо-графия считается золотым стандартом в диа-гнозе рака поджелудочной железы и в оценке резектабельности опухоли в большинстве цен-тров [6]. Чувствительность КТ, по данным лите-ратуры, в оценке резектабельности рака подже-лудочной железы составляет от 81% до 96,3% [12,13,[14][15][16]. Из-за особенностей анатомиче-ского взаимоотношения поджелудочной железы и окружающих сосудов, трехмерные рекон-струкции являются полезными в представлении дополнительной информации [17,18].…”
Section: материалы и методыunclassified
“…CT, as cited in the literature, for evaluating resectability in pancreatic carcinoma is between 81% and 96.3% [4,11,[13][14][15] . Due to the particular anatomical relationship between the pancreas and the surrounding vessels, threedimensional reconstructions are helpful in presenting additional information about this relationship [16,17] .…”
Section: Klauß M Et Al 3d-reconstructions In Pancreatic Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%