TNFα G308A polymorphism is associated with resilience to sleep deprivation-induced psychomotor vigilance performance impairment in healthy young adults

Abstract

Cytokines such as TNFα play an integral role in sleep/wake regulation and have recently been hypothesized to be involved in cognitive impairment due to sleep deprivation. We examined the effect of a guanine to adenine substitution at position 308 in the TNFα gene (TNFα G308A) on psychomotor vigilance performance impairment during total sleep deprivation. A total of 88 healthy women and men (ages 22–40) participated in one of five laboratory total sleep deprivation experiments. Performance on a psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) was measured every 2 to 3 h. The TNFα 308A allele, which is less common than the 308G allele, was associated with greater resilience to psychomotor vigilance performance impairment during total sleep deprivation (regardless of time of day), and also provided a small performance benefit at baseline. The effect of genotype on resilience persisted when controlling for between-subjects differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and baseline sleep duration. The TNFα G308A polymorphism predicted less than 10% of the overall between-subjects variance in performance impairment during sleep deprivation. Nonetheless, the differential effect of the polymorphism at the peak of performance impairment was more than 50% of median performance impairment at that time, which is sizeable compared to the effects of other genotypes reported in the literature. Our findings provided evidence for a role of TNFα in the effects of sleep deprivation on psychomotor vigilance performance. Furthermore, the TNFα G308A polymorphism may have predictive potential in a biomarker panel for the assessment of resilience to psychomotor vigilance performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.

Functional Polymorphisms in Dopaminergic Genes Modulate Neurobehavioral and Neurophysiological Consequences of Sleep Deprivation

“…The magnitude of these effect sizes can be considered moderate to large5354. They appear considerably larger than what was previously reported for other genetic variants11, which emphasizes the robustness of the findings. The direction by which the DAT1 and DRD2 genotypes modulated sustained attention and subjective sleepiness after sleep deprivation should also be noted (Fig.…”

“…Importantly, these neurobehavioral and neurophysiological consequences vary widely among individuals. Ample evidence now demonstrates that genetic influences strongly modulate waking EEG oscillations and alters PVT lapses across prolonged waking, even within consecutive test sessions89101112. Consistent with a genetic contribution, the impact of sleep loss on distinct subjective, PVT, and neurophysiological markers of alertness, is trait-like and highly robust within individuals.…”

Sleep Quality and Chronotype Differences between Elite Athletes and Non-Athlete Controls

“…Specifically, there were 15 subjects taken from study 1, 48 subjects taken from study 2, and 20 subjects taken from study 5 as published previously [45]. Controls were screened to be physically and psychologically healthy as verified with medical history and physical exam, with no current medical or drug treatment (except oral contraceptives).…”

Signal-to-Noise Ratio in PVT Performance as a Cognitive Measure of the Effect of Sleep Deprivation on the Fidelity of Information Processing

“…3 A group of 99 healthy young adults (ages 22-37, 50 females) participated in one of four in-laboratory studies (study 1: n = 37; study 2: n = 12; study 3: n = 39; study 4: n = 11). In each of the studies, after baseline sleep (10 hr time in bed ending at 08:00) subjects were exposed to 38 hr of total sleep deprivation under constant supervision.…”

“…Interindividual differences in performance impairment on the task are stable and can be partially explained by genetic makeup. 3 The effects of sleep loss, circadian misalignment, and time on task on performance in a PVT session are characterized by an increase in response time (RT) variability across trials-particularly in the form of a skewing of the RT distribution to the right such that the biggest impact tends to be observed in the right tail of the distribution (Figure 1a)-in conjunction with a more modest increase in false starts. 1 Evidence from neuroimaging studies indicates that these effects, and interindividual differences therein, may be explained in terms of reduced processing capacity in the brain.…”