2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-019-00569-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TNFA -308G>A and -238G>A polymorphisms and risk to systemic sclerosis: impact on TNF-α serum levels, TNFA mRNA expression, and autoantibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive research has identified a strong primary association of TNF-863A and TNF-1031C alleles with ACA-positivity as well as TNF-857T allele with ATAs in SSc ( 64 ). Recent evidence indicated that TNFA polymorphisms, associated with higher sTNF-α levels, positively correlate with ARAs levels ( 65 ).…”
Section: Classical Disease-specific Autoantibodies In Clinical Manifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has identified a strong primary association of TNF-863A and TNF-1031C alleles with ACA-positivity as well as TNF-857T allele with ATAs in SSc ( 64 ). Recent evidence indicated that TNFA polymorphisms, associated with higher sTNF-α levels, positively correlate with ARAs levels ( 65 ).…”
Section: Classical Disease-specific Autoantibodies In Clinical Manifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunological dysregulation which includes autoimmunity, in ltration and activation of immune cells is the essential feature of SSc [17,18]. B cells have been involved in the pathogenesis of SSc directly as well as indirectly through producing autoantibodies and releasing proin ammatory/pro brotic cytokines and chemokines [17,35,36]. Previous studies reported that SSc patients showed altered B-cell homeostasis and activation with increased B-cells but decreased memory B-cells [19,22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/html/downloads.htm ) to detect a difference between case and control groups, assuming an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 with a power of 0.8 and 5 % type I error. The OR was based on previous evidence [ 22 – 24 ], and at least 128 athletes per group was necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%