2020
DOI: 10.3390/v12111221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TNF Signaling Dictates Myeloid and Non-Myeloid Cell Crosstalk to Execute MCMV-Induced Extrinsic Apoptosis

Abstract: Cytomegaloviruses all encode the viral inhibitor of caspase-8-induced apoptosis (vICA). After binding to this initiator caspase, vICA blocks caspase-8 proteolytic activity and ability to activate caspase-3 and/or caspase-7. In this manner, vICA has long been known to prevent apoptosis triggered via tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family death receptor-dependent extrinsic signaling. Here, we employ fully wild-type murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) and vICA-deficient MCMV (∆M36) to investigate the contribution of TNF si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(218 reference statements)
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Necroptotic RIPK3 [30], pyroptotic mediators (CASP1 and CASP11) [96,97], pyroptosis executioner gasdermin D [98], MCMV-associated inflammasome components (adaptor ASC, nucleic acid sensor AIM2) [99], as well type I and type II interferon signaling (via interferon alpha/beta receptor 1 [IFNAR1] or interferon gamma receptor [IFNGR] respectively) were all dispensable for the BAX/BAK-dependent death induced by the vMIA/vIBO-deficient virus (Figures 3D and S3A). The behavior of ∆M36 affirmed previous findings [29] showing that vICA was necessary to suppress TNFR1-dependent cell death (Figure 3A). M45mutRHIM-infected WT or Tnfr1 −/− cells exhibited similar susceptibility to cell death that remained dependent on necroptosis mediator RIPK3, but not on RIPK1, CASP8, nucleic acid sensor ZBP1, or BAX and BAK (Figures 3B-D and S3B).…”
Section: Vmia and Vibo Suppress Contributions From Tnf Signalingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Necroptotic RIPK3 [30], pyroptotic mediators (CASP1 and CASP11) [96,97], pyroptosis executioner gasdermin D [98], MCMV-associated inflammasome components (adaptor ASC, nucleic acid sensor AIM2) [99], as well type I and type II interferon signaling (via interferon alpha/beta receptor 1 [IFNAR1] or interferon gamma receptor [IFNGR] respectively) were all dispensable for the BAX/BAK-dependent death induced by the vMIA/vIBO-deficient virus (Figures 3D and S3A). The behavior of ∆M36 affirmed previous findings [29] showing that vICA was necessary to suppress TNFR1-dependent cell death (Figure 3A). M45mutRHIM-infected WT or Tnfr1 −/− cells exhibited similar susceptibility to cell death that remained dependent on necroptosis mediator RIPK3, but not on RIPK1, CASP8, nucleic acid sensor ZBP1, or BAX and BAK (Figures 3B-D and S3B).…”
Section: Vmia and Vibo Suppress Contributions From Tnf Signalingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To determine the impact of combined BAX/BAK suppression by M38.5-encoded vMIA and M41.1-encoded vIBO, we compared the replication of mutant viruses to parental K181 (Figure 1A-C). The genomic integrity of double mutants and control viruses were confirmed by direct evaluation (Figure S1A), as previously shown for single mutant viruses [29,30,38]. MCMV was shed in saliva mediates horizontal transmission [88], so viral load in these glands may therefore be considered an indicator of viral fitness.…”
Section: M385-encoded Vmia and M411-encoded Vibo Support Viral Fitnesssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TNF family contains cysteine-rich extracellular domains and a cytoplasmic domain of about 80 amino acids called the "death domain". This death domain plays a critical role in transmitting the death signal from the cell surface to the intracellular signaling pathways [13][14][15].…”
Section: The Extrinsic Death Receptor Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These publications exemplify the fact that viruses have evolved multiple ways to dampen the host IFN response by interfering, disrupting, or evading specific host regulators, both up-and downstream of IFN induction. The diverse viral escape pathways are described in the following reviews [7,8,[10][11][12][13] and one original article on herpes-viruses [14]. A recent discovery stems from the observation that DNA sensing by the cGAS/STING pathway can be triggered by certain RNA viruses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%