TMT’s Attention towards Financial Goals and Innovation Investment: Evidence from China

Abstract

Will the top managers’ attention to financial goals such as profit targets, operating expenses or debt payback schedule affect the firm’s innovation investment? The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the attention that the top management team (TMT) allocate on financial goals and R&D investment in Chinese firms. The roles of ownership type and company size as moderating effects in the relationship were also analyzed. This study used a panel dataset of 484 firms listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2014. The results show that TMT’s attention to monetary objectives was negatively related to the R&D investment. In the state-owned and large-scale enterprises, the negative relationship between the TMT’s financial orientation and R&D investment is weak compared to that in private companies and smaller enterprises, respectively. Several conclusions have been drawn. First, the attention paid by TMT to financial goals significantly affects the innovation investment of the company. Specifically, when executives press the importance of monetary targets, they reduce innovation investment, given that the effects of firm-specific characteristics are controlled. Second, corporate ownership significantly moderates the relationship. Given the same degree of attention bias toward financial targets, compared with those in private companies, executives in state-owned companies tend to be more willing to invest in corporate innovation activities. Third, as the size of the company increases, the company’s comprehensive strength and ability to resist risks would increase, which in turn raises the willingness to undertake high-cost and long-term-to-realize-benefit innovation activities, thus alleviating the effect of TMT’s pressure on financial performance.

Examining the Impact of Innovation Forms on Sustainable Economic Performance: The Influence of Family Management

“…Moreover, by means of the development of product innovations, firms are able to compete more successfully than their competitors by gaining first-mover advantages, and thus, by increasing their sales volumes and overall business success [58,59]. However, product innovations also often present certain difficulties as a result of changing customer needs, shortening product life cycles and growing global competition [60,61].…”

Can fund shareholding inhibit insufficient R&D input?——Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

“…In the case of lower risk of financial failure, the enterprise takes the good profitability, debt paying ability and asset liquidity, and has the R&D resources needed to achieve the long-term development. However, when the risk of financial failure is intensified, the top management team’s attention to monetary objectives is negatively related to the R&D input [ 41 ]. And then, the management will inevitably neglect the necessary R&D input, which will have a negative impact on corporate long-term value creation.…”

E-commerce Industry’s R&D, Market Operating and Performance: Based on Worldwide Listed Companies’ Empirical Analysis

“…In the Schumpeterian growth theory, research and innovation are market conducts for entrepreneurs pursuing maximum profits. A company's R&D input directly affects its independent innovative capabilities, which makes it difficult for its products to be copied or replaced [14,15]. Therefore, research and innovation are the core for the company to improve its performance and eventually surpass its competitors [16][17][18].…”