2019
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titi monkeys combine alarm calls to create probabilistic meaning

Abstract: Previous work suggested that titi monkeys Callicebus nigrifrons combine two alarm calls, the A- and B-calls, to communicate about predator type and location. To explore how listeners process these sequences, we recorded alarm call sequences of six free-ranging groups exposed to terrestrial and aerial predator models, placed on the ground or in the canopy, and used multimodel inference to assess the information encoded in the sequences. We then carried out playback experiments to identify the features used by l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then callers produced mixed sequences containing both A and B calls in combinatorial but non-permutational ways [43]. In subsequent playback experiments, it could be shown that sequences recorded under the four experimental conditions (aerial predator ground or canopy, terrestrial predator ground or canopy) elicited adequate behavioural responses (figure 4, [44]). One specific combinatorial feature, the proportion of B-call bigrams in the sequence, had a particularly strong impact on recipient responses, suggesting it served as a main carrier of meaning.…”
Section: (Iii) Combination Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then callers produced mixed sequences containing both A and B calls in combinatorial but non-permutational ways [43]. In subsequent playback experiments, it could be shown that sequences recorded under the four experimental conditions (aerial predator ground or canopy, terrestrial predator ground or canopy) elicited adequate behavioural responses (figure 4, [44]). One specific combinatorial feature, the proportion of B-call bigrams in the sequence, had a particularly strong impact on recipient responses, suggesting it served as a main carrier of meaning.…”
Section: (Iii) Combination Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subjects looked more upwards when they were tested with sequences elicited by an aerial predator or by a predator in the canopy. Reproduced with permission from Berthet et al[44]. (Online version in colour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, white-faced sakis (P. pithecia) respond to small terrestrial threats (small cats and some snakes) with alarm calls and mobbing behaviors but move lower in the canopy and remain motionless for long periods of time (i.e., "freezing") in response to large raptors (Buchanan, Mittermeier, & Roosmalen, 1981;Gleason & Norconk, 2002). In the only experimental study on pitheciids to date, black-fronted titi monkeys (Callicebus nigrifrons) have been shown to respond to terrestrial and aerial predator models with alarm call sequences that convey information about predator type and location in the forest matrix (Berthet et al, 2019;Cäsar, Byrne, Young, & Zuberbühler, 2012b;Cäsar, Zuberbühler, Young, & Byrne, 2013), and listeners can distinguish among conspecific alarm calls (Cäsar, Byrne, Hoppitt, et al, 2012a). Thus, pitheciid monkeys may exhibit anti-predator strategies adapted to the predator's hunting style and the level of perceived threat, but more systematic data are needed to assess the consistency of these responses across taxa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, information about predatory threats and an individual's related level of arousal has been demonstrated to be reflected by changes in the number of repeated elements or the inter-element intervals [5,6]. A few primate species have furthermore been described to combine distinct call types into larger sequences, where the proportional distribution of calls and transitional probabilities among call types contain contextual information [7,8]. However, the precise mechanisms underlying how the information in these large sequences is conveyed are often less clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neighbours versus strangers [14]. In contrast, call combinations have been demonstrated to contain meaningful, context-specific information based on the temporal ordering of the units contained in longer sequences [3,7]. For example, bonobos (Pan paniscus) combine five acoustically graded call types into longer, mixed sequences containing information about the type of food encountered [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%