2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titanium mesh-reinforced calcium sulfate for structural bone grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the porosity is too high, the compressive property and strength of the implant will be reduced, and it would be di cult to bear the stress of the bone resulting in a shortened service life. If the porosity is too low, it will hinder the material exchange of cells and affect the osteogenic ability [36,37]. The porosity of the titanium mesh is not certain, but is closely related to the design of the pore size and shape of the titanium mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the porosity is too high, the compressive property and strength of the implant will be reduced, and it would be di cult to bear the stress of the bone resulting in a shortened service life. If the porosity is too low, it will hinder the material exchange of cells and affect the osteogenic ability [36,37]. The porosity of the titanium mesh is not certain, but is closely related to the design of the pore size and shape of the titanium mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to manufacture the numerically designed scaffolds, innovative technologies and new biocompatible materials are needed to accelerate the development of available grafting techniques. The traditional orthopedic biomaterial is titanium (Ti), which is biocompatible and strong, but this metal is much stiffer than bone (leading to stress shielding) and does not resorb [ 20 ]. While the cortical tissue has an elasticity modulus between 17 and 20 MPa, Ti has an elasticity modulus around 110 GPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, repairing bone defects after surgical resection promotes early functional recovery. A systematic PubMed search revealed several previously reported potent options for bone reconstruction, including cement filling technology (4), autogenous vascularized or nonvascularized bone grafting technology (14)(15)(16), allogenous bone grafting (17), bone transport (Ilizarov technique) (18, 19), bone regeneration induced by a biological membrane (Masquelet technique) (20), mental augmentation with or without stem extension (21), titanium mesh (22), and a promising advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printed microporous implants (23). To the best of our knowledge, the interventions for bone defects vary depending on the lesion site, defect length, patient status, and medical therapeutic skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%