2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0614-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titanium cages in the surgical treatment of severe vertebral osteomyelitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
123
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Thongtrangan et al [19] reported a 100 % fusion for 15 patients who underwent tumor resections, and Liljenqvist et al [20] reported the same rate in 20 patients who underwent placement of the cage in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Auguste et al [6] reported a 100 % fusion rate for 22 patients, in whom the cage was inserted for the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy in 16 of them.…”
Section: Fusion Ratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thongtrangan et al [19] reported a 100 % fusion for 15 patients who underwent tumor resections, and Liljenqvist et al [20] reported the same rate in 20 patients who underwent placement of the cage in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Auguste et al [6] reported a 100 % fusion rate for 22 patients, in whom the cage was inserted for the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy in 16 of them.…”
Section: Fusion Ratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is also obvious that the failure of conservative measures, compression of neural elements, mechanical derangement (instability, malalignment, severe bone destruction), and intractable pain demands surgery that can guarantee thorough debridement, decompression, restoration of spinal alignment and correction of instability [7,8,18]. However, surgeons still discuss staging, surgical access, and usage of instrumentation or cages [3,14,15,20]. Furthermore, minimally invasive and endoscopic surgeries are being promoted [9,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true for the thoraco-lumbar region [7,14,16,18,19,24], as well as for the cervical spine [15][16][17]24]. Furthermore, a direct comparison between autologous iliac bone strut and cages did not show a difference in clinical and imaging outcomes [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, a direct comparison between autologous iliac bone strut and cages did not show a difference in clinical and imaging outcomes [22]. Safe use of expandable titanium cages has been demonstrated for the thoraco-lumbar region [18,19], but has not been reported yet in detail for the cervical spondylitic spine. Figures depicting the use of expandable cages in cervical vertebral body replacement are given in the papers published by Lee [17] and Acosta [1] in 2004 without going into details.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation