Tisztesség, empátia, közgazdaságtan

Fazekas, Károly

doi:10.18414/ksz.2016.10.1120

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Az empátia és szimpátia rokonértelmű, de egymástól elhatárolható fogalmak, e tekintetbenFazekas [2016] elemzését elfogadva, a Smith által használt szimpátia fogalom valójában a mai értelemben az empátiával azonos.…”

unclassified

Munka, kapitalizmus és szabadság = Work, capitalism and freedom

Baranyi¹,

Csontos²

2022

RETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fejlodesgazdasagtan.hu hasábjain az elmúlt hetekben pezsgő vita bontakozott ki a munka fogalmával és a szabadsággal kapcsolatban. A vitában részt vevő kollégák közös kiindulópontja, hogy a munka a szabadság ellentétpárjaként jelenik meg mind a közgazdaságtudományban, mind a köznapi szóhasználatban. Jelen írásunkban a szakmai párbeszéd tanulságait szeretnénk összefoglalni. A szerzők amellett foglalnak állást, hogy a szabadság nem a munkanélküliség állapota, a munka kommodifikált, kizsákmányoló fogalmán túl a munka a szabadság gyakorlásának, a személyes fejlődésnek és a társadalmi részvételnek egyik fontos formája lehet. In the website of “Fejlodesgazdasagtan”, a lively debate has been unfolding in recent weeks about the concept of work and freedom. The common starting point was that work appears as the opposite of freedom in economic literature and in everyday language. In this paper, we aim to summarise the lessons learned from this discussion. We argue that freedom and work are not mutually exclusive concepts. In our view, a workless society cannot be an ideal. We point out that beyond the commodified, exploitative concept of work, it can also be interpreted as a form of personal development, practising freedom and participation in society.

show abstract

unclassified

Munka, kapitalizmus és szabadság = Work, capitalism and freedom

Baranyi¹,

Csontos²

2022

RETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Is Lack of Morality an Explanation for the Economic and Financial Crisis? A Catholic Point of View

Katona

2020

Int Adv Econ Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Before 2008, several studies provided empirical evidence of a positive correlation between the functions of financial intermediation and economic growth. In 2008, the financial crisis shook trust in this correlation. Several studies found that comprehensive and fundamental changes were needed in the entire financial market. Attention focused on the role of morality as an essential and integral element of the economy, arguing that without a moral attitude at the individual and institutional levels, the whole system necessarily runs into crisis. Among the moral interpretations of the economy, which are concurrently based on philosophical tradition and religious doctrine, the Catholic Church has presented some of the most consistent and unified teachings related to such questions over time, but the effect on economic thinking is less than what relevance and other merits justify. Catholic social teaching suggests morality and the economy are inseparable and highlights the moral interpretation of economic discrepancies. By analyzing theoretical and empirical evidence, this paper assesses the economic validity and legitimacy of Catholic thought about the immanent role of ethics in the economy and the financial crisis.

show abstract

Tisztesség, empátia, közgazdaságtan

Cited by 2 publications

References 23 publications

Munka, kapitalizmus és szabadság = Work, capitalism and freedom

Munka, kapitalizmus és szabadság = Work, capitalism and freedom

Is Lack of Morality an Explanation for the Economic and Financial Crisis? A Catholic Point of View

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About