2022
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue-wide genetic and cellular landscape shapes the execution of sequential PRC2 functions in neural stem cell lineage progression

Abstract: The generation of a correctly sized cerebral cortex with all-embracing neuronal and glial cell–type diversity critically depends on faithful radial glial progenitor (RGP) cell proliferation/differentiation programs. Temporal RGP lineage progression is regulated by Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), and loss of PRC2 activity results in severe neurogenesis defects and microcephaly. How PRC2-dependent gene expression instructs RGP lineage progression is unknown. Here, we use mosaic analysis with double markers… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(157 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest a role for the polycomb complex and chromatin remodellers in the progression of the temporal programme in the neural tube (Fig 2F). This is consistent with the extension of the early temporal competence window in Drosophila neuroblasts lacking PRC1 or PRC2 (Lucas et al, 2021) although results in mammalian cortex (Amberg et al, 2022;Telley et al, 2019) highlights the complexity of regulating the temporal transitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results suggest a role for the polycomb complex and chromatin remodellers in the progression of the temporal programme in the neural tube (Fig 2F). This is consistent with the extension of the early temporal competence window in Drosophila neuroblasts lacking PRC1 or PRC2 (Lucas et al, 2021) although results in mammalian cortex (Amberg et al, 2022;Telley et al, 2019) highlights the complexity of regulating the temporal transitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Regulation via miRNAs [175, 176] and other RNA-mediated processes [177] may contribute to progenitor diversity. Dynamic changes in chromatin conformation could further diversify neural progenitor states [178‒181] and thus increase flexibility of neuronal differentiation. Some chromatin modifications may be transient, depending upon local interactions, cell cycle phases, and the abundance and activity in individual progenitors of proteins that regulate DNA methylation [182, 183] or histone modifications [171, 180].…”
Section: Lining Up For Altered States: Balancing Progenitor Identitie...mentioning
confidence: 99%