2019
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue sealants for the prevention of lymphoceles after radical inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and individual patient data meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background and Objectives Postoperative lymphoceles and further wound complications occur frequently after radical inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). In various studies, tissue sealants have shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative morbidity. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of tissue sealants in reducing the incidence of postoperative lymphoceles following ILND in patients with melanoma was conducted. Individual pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,10,11 There have been multiple studies that have investigated interventions designed to either reduce the incidence or reduce the extent of the problem once it has become established. [12][13][14][15] A recent systematic review by the Cochrane Group 11 identified a lack of any useful data and concluded that, ''…there is a need for high quality RCTs to guide clinical practice in this under-researched area.'' Unfortunately, there have been no studies to date that have demonstrated a reliable method to reduce the incidence of seroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,11 There have been multiple studies that have investigated interventions designed to either reduce the incidence or reduce the extent of the problem once it has become established. [12][13][14][15] A recent systematic review by the Cochrane Group 11 identified a lack of any useful data and concluded that, ''…there is a need for high quality RCTs to guide clinical practice in this under-researched area.'' Unfortunately, there have been no studies to date that have demonstrated a reliable method to reduce the incidence of seroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques aiming to reduce complications are for example prophylactic vacuum-sealing therapy [ 20 ], sartorius transposition [ 10 , 21 ], or video-endoscopic minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) [ 22 ] showing inconclusive results concerning the reduction of lymphatic leakage. Several previous RCTs have attempted to reduce lymphatic complications after RILND by employing hemostyptic agents, however, without using a consistent endpoint definition as confirmed by a current systematic review and meta-analysis [ 7 ]. A standardized definition of “postoperative lymphatic leakage after RILND” is necessary for any subsequent step to estimate the effect of prophylactic interventions to provide the patient with the best available operative technique and ultimately to achieve a better oncological outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group reasons that a standardized classification would provide valuable information to guide further treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the benefit of applying tissue sealants to reduce postoperative lymphatic leakage after RILND in melanoma patients that was recently published by our study group points out that it is difficult to conduct a valid comparison of the results of the trials studied due to inhomogeneous endpoint definitions [7]. The studies that were included used different endpoints to describe lymphogenic morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerken et al [29] ran a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the preventive effect of brincontaining tissue sealants on lymphocele formation after radical inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma. They used six clinical trials including 194 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%