2015
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue reactions after subcutaneous and intraosseous implantation of iRoot SP, MTA and AH Plus

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reactions of rat subcutaneous connective tissue and bone tissue to iRoot SP, ProRoot MTA, and AH Plus. Specimens were implanted in the dorsal subcutaneous connective tissue and tibias of 36 Wistar rats. Tissue specimens were collected after rats were sacrificed at 7, 30, and 60 days after implantation. Histologic evaluations comprising inflammation severity and new bone formation were blindly made on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. In subcutaneous implant t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
51
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the reaction of bone to a biomaterial allows one to evaluate its biocompatibility. Thus, we have preferred to test the osseous reaction to our materials using the tibias of Wistar rats in a similar manner as reported in the endodontic literature [ 3 , 7 , 13 , 22 , 23 ]. Also in these studies, one can see that the study periods vary from author to author and there are no standart time points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the reaction of bone to a biomaterial allows one to evaluate its biocompatibility. Thus, we have preferred to test the osseous reaction to our materials using the tibias of Wistar rats in a similar manner as reported in the endodontic literature [ 3 , 7 , 13 , 22 , 23 ]. Also in these studies, one can see that the study periods vary from author to author and there are no standart time points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periapical surgery is commonly comprised of root-end resection, apical cavitation, and root-end filling to seal the communication between the periapical tissues and the root canal system [ 1 ]. An “ideal” root-end filling material should have properties like; easy handling, good biocompatibility and apical sealability at the root apex to prevent the egress of bacteria, and bacterial byproducts [ 2 , 3 ]. It should also be insoluble in body fluids such as blood, saliva, and tissue fluid [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BC Sealer has moderate cytotoxic effects on osteoblasts at five weeks [119] but another study showed that iRoot SP and MTA induced differentiation of dental papilla stem cells to odontoblast-like cells and induced biomineralziation [122]. No difference in inflammatory response to intraosseous and subcutaneous placement of iRoot SP and MTA was noted in rats and both of these materials showed biocompatibility [123].…”
Section: Bc Sealer and Iroot Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TotalFill BC (FKG, Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland; marketed as EndoSequence BC from Brasseler USA in North America) is a newer calcium silicate-based cement that was developed to overcome the disadvantages of MTA. It is a biocompatible [19] premixed cement that sets in the presence of water and has shorter setting time than MTA [16]. It is also reported that BC is a bioactive cement [20] with similar compressive strength to MTA [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%