2004
DOI: 10.1185/030079904125003412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue microarrays: a current medical research tool

Abstract: Recent research in molecular biology has identified a significant number of novel markers, which may have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic significance. This is particularly pertinent in the field of cancer. Validation of these markers in multiple clinical specimens is currently performed by traditional histopathological techniques, which are disappointingly time consuming, labour intensive and, therefore, economically costly. These limitations have hampered the introduction of many novel markers into ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports reviewing the accuracy and reliability of tissue microarray vs standard sections on breast cancers have concluded that results derived from tissue microarrays are representative. 34,35 In this current study, when cases constructed in duplicate, triplicate and more microarray cores were compared, 85 and 92% of cases revealed agreement of p53 and CD117 immunohistochemical findings, respectively, when positive vs negative immunostaining of stromal cells was evaluated. We compared only stromal immunostaining as this was the cellular component under main scrutiny in these tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Previous reports reviewing the accuracy and reliability of tissue microarray vs standard sections on breast cancers have concluded that results derived from tissue microarrays are representative. 34,35 In this current study, when cases constructed in duplicate, triplicate and more microarray cores were compared, 85 and 92% of cases revealed agreement of p53 and CD117 immunohistochemical findings, respectively, when positive vs negative immunostaining of stromal cells was evaluated. We compared only stromal immunostaining as this was the cellular component under main scrutiny in these tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It allows rapid, high throughput expression profiling by IHC in archival tissues [19][20][21] and its utility has been validated by several studies using both epithelial and mesenchymal tumor samples. [22][23][24] More recently, tissue microarray has also been shown to be an effective method for the assessment of HER-2 gene amplification with fluorescent in situ hybridization or chromogenic in situ hybridization in breast tumors. 25,26 In searching for foundations for further investigation to optimize patient selection for cetuximab therapy, we sought to exploit both the chromogenic in situ hybridization and tissue microarray techniques, and to analyze the frequency of EGFR gene amplification and its relationship with immuno histochemical protein expression in colorectal carcinomas by performing a comparative immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization study on tissue microarray sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further confirmation is also highly recommended at the protein level, such as by Western blot analysis, flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry. In this context, it is currently possible to evaluate genes at the protein level using tissue microarray assays (31)(32)(33). Tissue microarray assay is a method that allows the evaluation of up to one thousand tissues at once using a specific marker.…”
Section: Analysis Tools For the Identification Of Gene Expression Patmentioning
confidence: 99%