2016
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Microarray Is a Reliable Tool for the Evaluation of HER2 Amplification in Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concordance results observed in those studies were evaluated using the 2007 ASCO/CAP scoring criteria (6). When we analyzed our data 18 were IHC 2+ and one was IHC 3+) and kappa value was 0.66), within the concordance range reported in the above mentioned studies. Among the 431 cases considered FISH non-amplified, one (0.2%) was evaluated as positive for protein expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The concordance results observed in those studies were evaluated using the 2007 ASCO/CAP scoring criteria (6). When we analyzed our data 18 were IHC 2+ and one was IHC 3+) and kappa value was 0.66), within the concordance range reported in the above mentioned studies. Among the 431 cases considered FISH non-amplified, one (0.2%) was evaluated as positive for protein expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Average HER2 status by IHC and FISH on random TMA sections were available for 99 cases out of the 116 selected cases (85.3%). In order to evaluate the agreement between the two methods, positive, negative and overall concordance were calculated as previously published (18) following the recommendation of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines (5). The level of agreement was also measured using the Cohen's kappa test (agreement adjusted by chance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations