2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-019-01090-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Fixation Conditions for p16 Immunohistochemistry and Human Papillomavirus RNA In Situ Hybridization in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, different tissue fixatives were reported as the culprit in false negative results of P16 immunostain in oropharyngeal SCCs, while HPV-RNA ISH results remained positive under the same conditions. 34 We compared the current results to our previous study of HPV-DNA ISH and its concordance with P16, and surgical follow-up diagnoses in 59 patients with HNSCC. 35 There was discordance between HPV-DNA ISH and P16 staining in four (7.3%) cases (three P16+/ HPV-and one P16-/HPV+).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, different tissue fixatives were reported as the culprit in false negative results of P16 immunostain in oropharyngeal SCCs, while HPV-RNA ISH results remained positive under the same conditions. 34 We compared the current results to our previous study of HPV-DNA ISH and its concordance with P16, and surgical follow-up diagnoses in 59 patients with HNSCC. 35 There was discordance between HPV-DNA ISH and P16 staining in four (7.3%) cases (three P16+/ HPV-and one P16-/HPV+).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different transport media may affect the P16 staining. In one study, different tissue fixatives were reported as the culprit in false negative results of P16 immunostain in oropharyngeal SCCs, while HPV‐RNA ISH results remained positive under the same conditions 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Récemment, Lewis et al ont montré qu'un retard de fixation pouvait être responsable d'une perte artéfactuelle de l'immunomarquage anti-p16 par autolyse tissulaire. Dans ce travail, de façon intéressante, l'hybridation in situ ciblant l'ARN restait positive quelque soient les conditions de fixation [32]. Enfin, des modifications épigénétiques pourraient être responsables de l'extinction secondaire de la protéine p16, par hyperméthylation du gène codant la protéine p16 [33].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified