Tissue Engineering the Pinna: Comparison and Characterization of Human Decellularized Auricular Biological Scaffolds

Abstract

Decellularization is one of the promising techniques in tissue engineering used to create a biological scaffold for subsequent repopulation with the patient’s own cells. This study aims to compare two different decellularization protocols to optimize the process of auricle decellularization by assessing and characterizing the decellularization effects on human auricular cartilage. Herein, 12 pairs (8 females, 4 males) of freshly frozen adult human cadaveric auricles were de-epithelialized and defatted leaving only the cartilaginous framework. An auricle from each pair was randomly assigned to either protocol A (latrunculin B-based decellularization) or protocol B (trypsin-based decellularization). Gross examination of the generated scaffolds demonstrated preservation of the auricles’ contours and a change in color from pinkish-white to yellowish-white. Hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrated empty cartilaginous lacunae in both study groups, which confirms the depletion of cells. However, there was greater preservation of the extracellular matrix in auricles decellularized with protocol A as compared to protocol B. Comparing protocol A to protocol B, Masson’s trichrome and Safranin-O stains also demonstrated noticeable preservation of collagen and proteoglycans, respectively. Additionally, scanning electron micrographs demonstrated preservation of the cartilaginous microtopography in both study groups. Biomechanical testing demonstrated a substantial decrease in Young’s modulus after decellularization using protocol B (1.3 MPa), albeit not significant ( P -value > 0.05) when compared to Young’s modulus prior to decellularization (2.6 MPa) or after decellularization with protocol A (2.7 MPa). A DNA quantification assay demonstrated a significant drop ( P -value < 0.05) in the DNA content after decellularization with protocol A (111.0 ng/mg) and protocol B (127.6 ng/mg) in comparison to before decellularization (865.3 ng/mg). Overall, this study demonstrated effective decellularization of human auricular cartilage, and it is concluded that protocol A provided greater preservation of the extracellular matrix and biomechanical characteristics. These findings warrant proceeding with the assessment of inflammation and cell migration in a decellularized scaffold using an animal model.

Cationic nanoparticles enhance T cell tumor infiltration and antitumor immune responses to a melanoma vaccine

“…This was followed by embedding the specimens in paraffin blocks and slicing the paraffin blocks into thin sections. Next, the tissue sections were mounted onto microscope slides and subjected to dehydration and rehydration steps for subsequent staining with the basic nuclear stain (Harris hematoxylin, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and acidic stain (eosin, Leica Biosystems), respectively ( 73 , 74 ). Also, tissue specimens (skin and tumor) were stained with anti-mouse CD8 antibody.…”

Models of Cochlea Used in Cochlear Implant Research: A Review

“…In general, tissueengineered models are often constructed using scaffolds that support the growth and organisation of cells into tissues. For cochleae, there have been examples of organoid cultures [84] and decellularised tissues [100] for cochlear tissue engineering although more extensive studies of producing replacement tissues have been discussed for the middle and outer ear [3,5,22]. Lastly, computational models are increasingly being used to study the electrical and mechanical properties of the cochlea and the effects of CIs on the auditory system [7,14,110,118].…”

Current Status of Auricular Reconstruction Strategy Development

“…Decellularized cartilage matrix (CAM) is an ideal cartilage-specific biomimetic material with low-inflammatory responses. The advantage of such biological scaffolds is the preservation of inherent extracellular matrix and microscopic structures as well as residual effects of natural growth factors within the structures 47 . Thus, biological scaffolds obtained from tissue decellularization are increasingly recognized as substitutes for synthetic scaffolds in many fields of tissue engineering.…”