2020
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2771ed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Doppler Imaging of the Diaphragm: A New Kid on the Block?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diaphragm is the primary inspiratory muscle during breathing, and its movement is restricted with decreased compliance ( 23 - 25 ). Ultrasound has emerged as a widely used method for monitoring diaphragm function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( 26 - 28 ). Our study is the first to evaluate diaphragmatic muscle function using ultrasound as a proxy for changes in IAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diaphragm is the primary inspiratory muscle during breathing, and its movement is restricted with decreased compliance ( 23 - 25 ). Ultrasound has emerged as a widely used method for monitoring diaphragm function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( 26 - 28 ). Our study is the first to evaluate diaphragmatic muscle function using ultrasound as a proxy for changes in IAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the preliminary results are very significant, it is important to point out that much progress is still needed in the standardization of the method that includes the determination of the diaphragmatic movement point of interest (ROI); influence of other factors, such as compliance of the rib cage and activation of accessory inspiratory and expiratory muscles [ 114 ].…”
Section: Novel Techniques and Future Developments For Functional Imag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since we focused on the ultrasound test that was supported by the most evidence of validation at the time of data collection [16, 23-25, 30, 31], a cutaneous marker was not applied to minimize the variability of the ultrasound measurements, as described by Goligher et al [23]. In addition, advanced tools that are used to evaluate diaphragmatic function, such as tissue Doppler and speckle tracking, were not utilized [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%