Tissue dissociation for single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing for low amounts of input material

Abstract

Background Recent technological advances opened the opportunity to simultaneously study gene expression for thousands of individual cells on a genome-wide scale. The experimental accessibility of such single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) approaches allowed gaining insights into the cell type composition of heterogeneous tissue samples of animal model systems and emerging models alike. A major prerequisite for a successful application of the method is the dissociation of complex tissues into individual cells, which often requires large amounts of input material and harsh mechanical, chemical and temperature conditions. However, the availability of tissue material may be limited for small animals, specific organs, certain developmental stages or if samples need to be acquired from collected specimens. Therefore, we evaluated different dissociation protocols to obtain single cells from small tissue samples of Drosophila melanogaster eye-antennal imaginal discs. Results We show that a combination of mechanical and chemical dissociation resulted in sufficient high-quality cells. As an alternative, we tested protocols for the isolation of single nuclei, which turned out to be highly efficient for fresh and frozen tissue samples. Eventually, we performed scRNAseq and single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) to show that the best protocols for both methods successfully identified relevant cell types. At the same time, snRNAseq resulted in less artificial gene expression that is caused by rather harsh dissociation conditions needed to obtain single cells for scRNAseq. A direct comparison of scRNAseq and snRNAseq data revealed that both datasets share biologically relevant genes among the most variable genes, and we showed differences in the relative contribution of the two approaches to identified cell types. Conclusion We present two dissociation protocols that allow isolating single cells and single nuclei, respectively, from low input material. Both protocols resulted in extraction of high-quality RNA for subsequent scRNAseq or snRNAseq applications. If tissue availability is limited, we recommend the snRNAseq procedure of fresh or frozen tissue samples as it is perfectly suited to obtain thorough insights into cellular diversity of complex tissue.

A Single Cell Genomics Atlas of theDrosophilaLarval Eye Reveals Distinct Developmental Timelines and Novel Markers for All Photoreceptor Subtypes

“…Although single cell data from the Drosophila larval eye have been previously reported 18–20 , the data presented in this report differ substantially. Here, we present single cell transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility data from late larval eye discs that comprise a deep representation of all known cell types in this tissue.…”

Investigative needle core biopsies for multi-omics in Glioblastoma

“…Similar challenges were faced in diffuse midline gliomas such as intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), where tissue samples are necessarily limited due to the extreme sensitivity of the brain structures involved. Although scRNAseq was shown to be feasible with low tissue input volumes ( 28, 29 ), the number of cells sequenced was low (2458 cells from 6 patients)( 30 ). More recently multi-location biopsy sampling was combined with scRNAseq ( 31 ), and in this study, the investigators sequenced 6148 cells from 73 biopsy sites in 13 patients.…”

Looking across the gap: Understanding the evolution of eyes and vision among insects

“…First, the application of single cell transcriptomics in Drosophila has verified many of the known regulators and cell types but also identified new genes and cell markers [100][101][102][103] as well as detailed new insights into the regulation and function of the Drosophila visual system more broadly [104,105] (Box 2). Furthermore, combining sc-RNA-seq with other "-omics" approaches, such as single cell ATAC-seq chromatin profiling, has provided major new knowledge about the GRNs for Drosophila eye and optic lobe development, and predictive power to model and test the regulatory logic underling gene expression.…”