2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.785285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Damage, Not Infection, Triggers Hepatic Unfolded Protein Response in an Experimental Rat Peritonitis Model

Abstract: BackgroundAbdominal surgery is an efficient treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis. Surgical trauma and peritoneal infection lead to the activation of multiple pathological pathways. The liver is particularly susceptible to injury under septic conditions. Liver function is impaired when pathological conditions induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. ER stress triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR), aiming at restoring ER homeostasis, or inducing cell death. In order to translate basic knowledge on ER func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also often presumed in animal models that in ammation triggers ERS response (and vice versa). Our ndings are in concordance with the recent animal study by Müllebner et al showing that peritoneal infection induced by CLP predominantly triggered in ammatory response, while damages caused by surgery were predominant triggers of the ERS/UPR response (20). They hypothesized that ERS/UPR and in ammatory response in vivo during sepsis may be triggered by different mechanisms and that secondary tissue injury in uences the severity of ERS more than the intensity of local and systemic in ammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is also often presumed in animal models that in ammation triggers ERS response (and vice versa). Our ndings are in concordance with the recent animal study by Müllebner et al showing that peritoneal infection induced by CLP predominantly triggered in ammatory response, while damages caused by surgery were predominant triggers of the ERS/UPR response (20). They hypothesized that ERS/UPR and in ammatory response in vivo during sepsis may be triggered by different mechanisms and that secondary tissue injury in uences the severity of ERS more than the intensity of local and systemic in ammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, a recent study questioned the causal relationship between in ammation, organ injury and ERS during sepsis. Thus, in a model of surgical peritoneal sepsis (cecal ligation-puncture (CLP)), peritoneal infection predominantly triggered in ammatory responses, while damages induced by surgical stress were predominant triggers of the ERS/UPR response (20). These data, showing that in ammation was little associated with tissue trauma (but driven by infection) while ERS/UPR were essentially driven by tissue trauma more than by infection or systemic in ammation, raise the question of the relationship between ERS, in ammation and volume of organ damage (cellular necrosis / tissue degradation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each PCR reaction contained SYBR R green I ® (0.5×, Sigma Aldrich, Vienna, Austria), iTaq TM DNA polymerase TM (25 U/L; Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), oligonucleotide primers (250 nmol/L each, Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA, USA), dNTP (200 µmol/L each), and MgCl 2 (3 mmol/L). Primer pairs for XBP1 were described elsewhere [25]. Randomly assigned no-reverse transcriptase controls corresponding to ~15% of all the samples investigated, a no-template control, and an internal standard, a pool generated of equal aliquots of cDNA of all samples investigated, were included in each measurement.…”
Section: Determination Of Xbp1 Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Récemment, une étude a interrogé la relation de causalité entre inflammation, lésions d'organe et SRE durant le sepsis. En effet, l'infection péritonéale engendrait la réponse inflammatoire alors que les dommages tissulaires induits par le stress chirurgical déclenchaient le SRE / UPR au sein d'un modèle murin de sepsis péritonéal chirurgical (27). Ces données, montrant que l'inflammation induite par l'infection était peu associée au tissu lésé, alors que le SRE/UPR était essentiellement induit par le traumatisme tissulaire plus que par l'infection ou l'inflammation systémique, posent la question de la relation entre le SRE, l'inflammation et le volume de tissu lésé.…”
Section: Preambuleunclassified
“…However, a recent study questioned the causal relationship between inflammation, organ injury and ERS during sepsis. Thus, in a model of surgical peritoneal sepsis [cecal ligation-puncture (CLP)], peritoneal infection predominantly triggered inflammatory responses, while damages induced by surgical stress were predominant triggers of the ERS/UPR response ( 20 ). These data, showing that inflammation was little associated with tissue trauma (but driven by infection) while ERS/UPR were essentially driven by tissue trauma more than by infection or systemic inflammation, raise the question of the relationship between ERS, inflammation and volume of organ damage (cellular necrosis/tissue degradation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%