2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1116995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate

Abstract: Normal tissue cells are generally not viable when suspended in a fluid and are therefore said to be anchorage dependent. Such cells must adhere to a solid, but a solid can be as rigid as glass or softer than a baby's skin. The behavior of some cells on soft materials is characteristic of important phenotypes; for example, cell growth on soft agar gels is used to identify cancer cells. However, an understanding of how tissue cells—including fibroblasts, myocytes, neurons, and other cell types—sense matrix stiff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

142
4,641
17
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,416 publications
(4,820 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
142
4,641
17
20
Order By: Relevance
“…These stiffness values are in the region of many soft tissues and compare well to previously published peptide hydrogel systems, including aromatic peptides4, 17 and peptide–amphiphile hydrogels 27, 28. The ability to tune the G′ value across a large range holds great promise for applications in tissue engineering, given that the behavior of cells has been found to be heavily influenced by the mechanical properties of their surrounding environment 29, 30…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…These stiffness values are in the region of many soft tissues and compare well to previously published peptide hydrogel systems, including aromatic peptides4, 17 and peptide–amphiphile hydrogels 27, 28. The ability to tune the G′ value across a large range holds great promise for applications in tissue engineering, given that the behavior of cells has been found to be heavily influenced by the mechanical properties of their surrounding environment 29, 30…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…One possibility is that tissue/matrix stiffness directly affects the cytoskeleton and thereby cell behaviour (Discher et al , 2005; Halder et al , 2012), as described in the concept of cellular “tensegrity” (Ingber & Jamieson, 1985). Our work demonstrated that the presence of laminin α5 in endothelial basement membrane correlates with increased endothelial cell cortical stiffness in vivo and in vitro , which suggests changes in cortical actin arrangement may also mechanically affect junctional proteins (Engl et al , 2014; Sauteur et al , 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies highlight the importance of physical forces within cells and tissues in the regulation of key biological processes including growth, differentiation, development, and cancer (Discher et al ., 2005; Assoian & Klein, 2008; Butcher et al ., 2009; Janmey & Miller, 2011; Janmey et al ., 2013; Humphrey et al ., 2014; Iskratsch et al ., 2014). The impact of mechanobiology on cutaneous biology and in particular skin aging is relatively unexplored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%