2010
DOI: 10.1586/epr.10.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue and serum proteomic profiling for diagnostic and prognostic bladder cancer biomarkers

Abstract: A panel of biomarkers for the early detection of bladder cancer has not yet been identified. Many different molecules, including DNA, RNA or proteins have been reported but none have provided adequate sensitivity for a single-tier screening test or a test to replace cystoscopy. Therefore, multimarker panels are discussed at present to give a more-precise answer to the biomarker quest. Mass spectrometry or 2D gel-electrophoresis have evolved greatly within recent years and are capable of analyzing multiple prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technologies used in biomarker design range from SELDI/MALDI-TOF MS through liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis mass spectroscopy and gel-based approaches to protein arrays. [32], [33] More recent metabolic approaches combined several techniques such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with gas chromatography or mass spectroscopy (MS) for the analysis of human urine metabolites in search for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapy monitoring biomarkers. [34][36] These studies support the potential for proteomic profiling as a non-invasive tool for detecting and monitoring bladder cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technologies used in biomarker design range from SELDI/MALDI-TOF MS through liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis mass spectroscopy and gel-based approaches to protein arrays. [32], [33] More recent metabolic approaches combined several techniques such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with gas chromatography or mass spectroscopy (MS) for the analysis of human urine metabolites in search for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapy monitoring biomarkers. [34][36] These studies support the potential for proteomic profiling as a non-invasive tool for detecting and monitoring bladder cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50] Their overexpression has been documented in several human malignancies including bladder cancer and was shown to be associated with tumor invasiveness. [23], [32], [49] Therefore, progressive deregulation of protein expression patterns in voided urine samples of patients with bladder cancer may be observed in aggressive variants of the disease. This may explain the relationship between global expression patterns of proteins in voided urine and clinical aggressiveness as identified by unsupervised clustering using the matrix of 473 protein peaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique often will yield inconsistent or variable results and is time-consuming, leading to difficulties when trying to compare multiple datasets. 38 Protein array techniques are newly emerging approaches for proteomic analysis in recent years. These can be targeted approaches in which specific antibodies can be immobilized to form a protein microarray for the capture and quantification of specific protein concentrations.…”
Section: Methods For Proteomic Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the disadvantages of this method are the high costs of antibodies and the fact that PTMs of proteins are more difficult to analyze. 38,40 …”
Section: Methods For Proteomic Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic technologies can provide high-throughput and in-depth analysis. Many of these studies have been performed on different cancer types including lung (11), breast (12), colorectal (13), bladder (14), prostate (15), head and neck (16) and ovarian cancers (17). The different cancer proteomics have generated a set of putative cancer biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%