2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue- and Blood-derived Genomic Biomarkers for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous mutations in PTEN and TP53 , and modifications in DNA repair genes and in the Wnt pathway were also disclosed [ 42 , 43 ]. A review of 11 studies comprising 1682 mHSPC patients shows changes in TP53 , DNA damage repair and the Wnt pathway to be frequent [ 44 ]. A less favorable clinical outcome is observed in the case of alterations in AR , Myc , TP53 or cell cycle signaling [ 44 ].…”
Section: Genome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous mutations in PTEN and TP53 , and modifications in DNA repair genes and in the Wnt pathway were also disclosed [ 42 , 43 ]. A review of 11 studies comprising 1682 mHSPC patients shows changes in TP53 , DNA damage repair and the Wnt pathway to be frequent [ 44 ]. A less favorable clinical outcome is observed in the case of alterations in AR , Myc , TP53 or cell cycle signaling [ 44 ].…”
Section: Genome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of 11 studies comprising 1682 mHSPC patients shows changes in TP53 , DNA damage repair and the Wnt pathway to be frequent [ 44 ]. A less favorable clinical outcome is observed in the case of alterations in AR , Myc , TP53 or cell cycle signaling [ 44 ]. Dominant-negative TP53 mutations are associated with a negative outcome and SPOP mutations with a favorable outcome in mHSPC patients [ 45 ].…”
Section: Genome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in DDR genes (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61; p < 0.001), and TP53 (IRR 1.45; p = 0.004) were associated with increasing number of metastatic lesions. Along with the specific high‐risk mutations detailed above, additional work in this space may hold potential in further classifying omCSPC patients 111–124 …”
Section: Metastatic Castration‐sensitive Prostate Cancer (Mcspc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic landscapes of primary prostate cancer, 12 metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), 13 and mCRPC 14 have been characterized, and have nominated oncogenic drivers and mechanisms of treatment resistance, as well as potential therapeutic targets. For example, genetic alterations in the AR gene locus (including amplifications, point mutations, or structural variants 15 ) and the presence of ligand‐independent splice variants (such as AR‐v7 16 ) seen in mCRPC have been implicated in resistance to ADT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at the posttranslational level, PTEN function is regulated by various modifications including phosphorylation, oxidation and ubiquitination, 28,29 so alterations in these posttranslational modifications could also diminish PTEN function. The frequency of PTEN loss in prostate cancer reported in the literature is highly variable and dependent on the source of tissue tested and assay used, 30 but homozygous loss or truncating mutation in the PTEN gene by next generation sequencing (NGS) is seen in ~16%–20% of metastatic cases 13,17,21 . The estimate of frequency of PTEN loss by NGS is likely an underestimate when compared with studies using highly validated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays (or FISH) that correlate with genomic alterations, 30 as NGS analysis of bulk tissues can easily underestimate homozygous deletions for PTEN because of normal cell contamination, and may not detect certain structural alterations detectable through linked‐read genome sequencing 31 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%