2014
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tips on improving the efficiency of electrotransfer of target proteins from Phos-tag SDS-PAGE gel

Abstract: The sensitivity of Western blotting analysis after Phos-tag SDS-PAGE is occasionally inferior to that after normal (Phos-tag-free) SDS-PAGE under similar experimental conditions, possibly as a result of inefficient electrotransfer from the Phos-tag gel to the blotting membrane. We therefore present tips on improving the efficiency of electrotransfer of proteins in semidry and wet-tank blotting. When model samples containing several standard phosphoproteins were subjected to semidry blotting, their electrotrans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this band shift was not seen when kinase‐dead Cdc5 was induced (Fig C). To verify the notion that these species corresponded to phosphorylated Dbf4, we resolved them on gels containing the Phos‐tag reagent, which specifically retards the migration of phosphorylated proteins (Kinoshita‐Kikuta et al , ). Consistently, the migration of Dbf4 was significantly retarded only when Cdc5 was induced, with increasing concentrations of Phos‐tag exaggerating this effect (Fig E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this band shift was not seen when kinase‐dead Cdc5 was induced (Fig C). To verify the notion that these species corresponded to phosphorylated Dbf4, we resolved them on gels containing the Phos‐tag reagent, which specifically retards the migration of phosphorylated proteins (Kinoshita‐Kikuta et al , ). Consistently, the migration of Dbf4 was significantly retarded only when Cdc5 was induced, with increasing concentrations of Phos‐tag exaggerating this effect (Fig E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membranes were transferred to Tris-buffered saline after the last wash and imaged within 1 h using a Li-Cor Odyssey scanner. Boxes were manually placed around each band of interest, which returned near-infrared fluorescent values of raw intensity with intralane background subtracted using Odyssey analytic software (27,31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell lysates were mixed with 3 × protein sample loading buffer (3.9 ml of 0.5 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 0.6 g of SDS, 3.0 ml of 100% glycerol, 1.5 ml of 2-mercaptoethanol [2-ME], 1.5 mg of 0.02% bromophenol blue) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Wako) and boiled at 100 °C for 10 min. The samples were resolved by Mn 2+ -Phos-tag SDS-8% PAGE containing 25 μM Phos-tag and 0.1 mM MnCl 2 as previously described 66 at a constant current of 25 mA at 10 °C for 7 h. After electrophoresis, the polyacrylamide gel was washed three times (40 min each) with transfer buffer containing 35 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), followed by two washes (30 min each) with transfer buffer without EDTA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Wako) with some modifications. Subsequently, the proteins were electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore) at a constant current (270 mA) for 4 h. Immunoblotting was performed with a mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (1:2,000; Abmart) as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%