2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80930-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tips in the treatment of refractory ascites (RA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MELD score classifies candidates undergoing TIPS based on objective laboratory findings, in contradistinction to the Child-Pugh classification which contains a subjective assessment that can lead to inter-observer variability based on clinicians' judgement. 29 30 31 32 Prior studies have shown that a MELD score of ≥18 is considered a high threshold cut-off for TIPS placement due to elective post-TIPS mortality, compared with a MELD <18 33 . However, a recent single center, retrospective study concluded that the mortality was ∼50% lower than expected when TIPS was performed in patients with MELD scores >18, suggesting the need for a prospective RCT.…”
Section: Management Of Refractory Ascitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MELD score classifies candidates undergoing TIPS based on objective laboratory findings, in contradistinction to the Child-Pugh classification which contains a subjective assessment that can lead to inter-observer variability based on clinicians' judgement. 29 30 31 32 Prior studies have shown that a MELD score of ≥18 is considered a high threshold cut-off for TIPS placement due to elective post-TIPS mortality, compared with a MELD <18 33 . However, a recent single center, retrospective study concluded that the mortality was ∼50% lower than expected when TIPS was performed in patients with MELD scores >18, suggesting the need for a prospective RCT.…”
Section: Management Of Refractory Ascitesmentioning
confidence: 99%