2019
DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tips for Improving the Writing and Reporting Quality of Systematic, Scoping, and Narrative Reviews

Abstract: The evidence base in health professions education continues to accumulate at an unprecedented rate. Summaries of evidence in the form of scoping, systematic and narrative reviews are also increasingly common. Unfortunately, many submissions go unpublished and for reasons that may be irreversible post-peer review. The goal of this commentary is to offer insights to review authors for improving the likelihood of publication success. These tips will not guarantee success; however, insights address common errors a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An SSR allows for a structured approach to systematic extraction, synthesis of actionable and applicable information and a summary of available literature across a wide range of settings [ 27 30 ]. To overcome concerns about the transparency and reproducibility of SSRs, we adopt Krishna’s Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) [ 31 – 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An SSR allows for a structured approach to systematic extraction, synthesis of actionable and applicable information and a summary of available literature across a wide range of settings [ 27 30 ]. To overcome concerns about the transparency and reproducibility of SSRs, we adopt Krishna’s Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) [ 31 – 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon Li et al's, 35 Wilkinson et al's 4 and Veloski et al's 36 reviews, this scoping review explores the size and scope 37 of published data in peer-reviewed literature on tools used to assess medical professionalism. [38][39][40][41][42][43] Use of a scoping review also allows for the systematic extraction, synthesis and summarising of actionable and applicable information 44 in available literature 45,46 across a wide range of pedagogies, assessment contents and practice settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic scoping review was deemed the appropriate method because of its focus on mapping the concept of engagement (Arksey and O'Malley, 2005). This approach is particularly useful to synthesize and summarize knowledge about an objective in question that exhibits a high level of heterogeneity and complexity that spans disciplines (Horsley, 2019).…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%