Tipología de hombres condenados por violencia de género en un contexto de intervención psicológica en la comunidad

Boira, Santiago; Jodrá, Pedro

doi:10.14349/rlp.v45i2.806

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 40 publications

(35 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Spain, both theoretical (e.g., Amor et al, 2009;Torres et al, 2013) and empirical research on batterer typologies (e.g., Boira & Jodrá, 2013;García-Jiménez et al, 2014;Herrero et al, 2016;Loinaz, 2014;Loinaz et al, 2011) have also been conducted. In this regard, a particularly noteworthy study (Loinaz, 2014) used the risk factors measured by the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER; Kropp et al, 2010) as clustering variables in a sample of 100 IPVAW imprisoned offenders in Spain (as opposed to self-reported clinical measures used in previously described studies).…”

Section: Ipvaw Offender Typologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: A Spanish Typology

Álvarez

Santos-Hermoso

Soldino

et al. 2021

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Typological approaches in research of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) have been discussed on the basis of their validity and applicability in professional practice; yet most of the published studies on offender typologies are limited due to the use of relatively small, non-representative samples. The current study explored typologies of IPVAW perpetrators in a large-scale representative Spanish sample ( n = 9,731 cases extracted from the Comprehensive Monitoring System of Gender-Based Violence Cases; VioGén System), according to classic batterer typologies proposed by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) . To this end, the risk factors measured by the most extended Spanish police recidivism risk assessment tool (Valoración Policial del Riesgo; VPR) were used as clustering variables. Multiple correspondence analyses revealed the appropriateness of a bi-dimensional model to conceptualize IPVAW offender typologies. Our four-group solution may be described based on the levels of instability and antisociality of IPVAW offenders, as objectively measured by VPR5.0 risk indicators. Statistically significant differences between the IPVAW suggested typologies were found on all indicators, except for the presence of perpetrators younger than 24 years old and the presence of bidirectional intimate partner violence, which were equally distributed across the four groups. High instability/low antisociality (HiLa) and high instability/high antisociality (HiHa) individuals shared most risk indicators related to the aggressor’s psychological instability; whereas HiHa and low instability/high antisociality (LiHa) men endorsed more antisociality indicators than statistically expected. The low instability/low antisociality (LiLa) group was characterized by the less presence of VPR risk indicators. Although the four subtypes identified in our study resembled classic typologies, we propose a new subtype, with high levels of instability and antisociality (i.e., HiHa). This work contributes to existing knowledge of the heterogeneity of these men, by providing useful typologies that can help inform prevention and treatment.

show abstract

Section: Ipvaw Offender Typologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: A Spanish Typology

Álvarez

Santos-Hermoso

Soldino

et al. 2021

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Este estudio meta-analítico obtiene conclusiones similares a las señaladas en otras revisiones sistemáticas sobre el mismo tema (Boira & Jodrá, 2013;Ibaceta, 2004). Es decir, concluye que las intervenciones con maltratadores que ejercen violencia hacia su pareja obtienen resultados no concluyentes, e, incluso, contradictorios en cuanto a sus efectos sobre las distorsiones cognitivas.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Distorsiones Cognitivas en los Programas de Intervención con Maltratadores Aplicados en España

Ferrer-Pérez¹,

Fiol²,

Blahopoulou³

2017

RIDEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenDesde 1994 se aplican en España programas de intervención para maltratadores en casos de violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja, inicialmente de modo puntual y de forma cada vez más generalizada. Este trabajo analiza los efectos de estos programas sobre las distorsiones cognitivas, medidas con el Inventario de Pensamientos Distorsionados sobre la Mujer y la Violencia (IPDMV). Para ello se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica sobre el tema, identificando un total de 182 registros, correspondientes a trabajos realizados en España y hechos públicos entre 1994 y enero de 2014. De ellos, se incluyeron en el estudio meta-analítico 7 registros, que informan sobre 10 intervenciones. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que estos programas obtienen resultados no concluyentes, e, incluso, contradictorios en cuanto a sus efectos sobre las distorsiones cognitivas. Se analizan estos resultados, así como su alcance y limitaciones, particularmente en lo relativo al instrumento de medida aplicado.Palabras clave: maltratadores, violencia en la pareja, rehabilitación psicosocial, distorsiones cognitivas, meta-análisis AbstractSince 1994 batterer intervention programs are implemented in Spain in cases of intimate partner violence against women, initially of a puntual mode and increasingly in a widespread form. The aim of this paper is to analyze the effects that the intervention programs implemented in Spain with batterers in cases of intimate partner violence have on cognitive distortions, measured by the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts on Women and Violence (IPDMV). A systematic review of the scientific literature identified a total of 182 records, corresponding to studies realized in Spain and published between 1994 and January 2014. Of these, 7 records, reporting from 10 interventions, were included in the meta-analytic study. The results show that these programs get results inconclusive, and even contradictory in their effects on cognitive distortions. These results as well as its scope and limitations are discussed, particularly in relation to the measuring instrument applied.

show abstract

“…In Spain, both theoretical (e.g., Amor et al, 2009;Torres, Lemos-Giráldez, & Herrero, 2013) and empirical research on batterer typologies (e.g., Boira & Jodrá, 2013;García-Jiménez, Godoy-Fernández, Llor-Esteban, & Ruiz-Hernández, 2014;Herrero, Torres, Fernández-Suárez, & Rodríguez-Díaz, 2016;Loinaz, 2014;Loinaz, Ortiz-Tallo, Sánchez, & Ferragut, 2011) have also been conducted. In this regard, a particularly noteworthy study (Loinaz, 2014) used the risk factors measured by the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER; Kropp, Hart, & Belfrage, 2010) as clustering variables in a sample of 100 IPVAW imprisoned offenders in Spain (as opposed to self-reported clinical measures used in previously described studies).…”

Section: Ipvaw Offender Typologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women: A Spanish typology

Álvarez¹,

Santos-Hermoso²,

Soldino³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Typological approaches in research of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) have been discussed on the basis of their validity and applicability in professional practice; yet, most of the published studies on offender typologies have informed as limitations the use of relatively small, non-representative samples. The current study explored typologies of IPVAW perpetrators in a large-scale representative Spanish sample (N = 9,731 cases extracted from the Comprehensive Monitoring System of Gender-Based Violence Cases; VioGén System), according to classic batterer typologies proposed by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). To this end, the risk factors measured by the most extended Spanish police recidivism risk assessment tool (Valoración Policial del Riesgo; VPR) were used as clustering variables. Multiple correspondence analyses revealed the appropriateness of a bi-dimensional model to conceptualize IPVAW offender typologies. Our four-group solution (i.e., LiLa, HiLa, HiHa, and LiHa) may be described based on the levels of instability and antisociality of IPVAW offenders, as objectively measured by VPR5.0 risk indicators. Statistically significant differences between IPVAW suggested typologies were found in all indicators, except for the presence of perpetrators younger than 24 years old and the presence of bidirectional intimate partner violence, which were equally distributed across the four groups. HiLa and HiHa individuals shared most risk indicators related to the aggressor’s psychological instability. On the other hand, HiHa and LiHa endorsed more antisociality indicators than statistically expected. Although the four subtypes identified in our study resembled classic typologies, we propose a new subtype, with high levels of instability and antisociality (i.e., HiHa), as a more representative IPVAW offender subtype than the classic LLA subgroup. This work contributes to existing knowledge of the heterogeneity of these men, by providing useful typologies that can help inform prevention and treatment.

show abstract

Tipología de hombres condenados por violencia de género en un contexto de intervención psicológica en la comunidad

Cited by 7 publications

References 40 publications

Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: A Spanish Typology

Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: A Spanish Typology

Distorsiones Cognitivas en los Programas de Intervención con Maltratadores Aplicados en España

Male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women: A Spanish typology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About