2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08689.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tip of the Red Giant Branch distances to galaxies with composite stellar populations

Abstract: The accurate determination of galaxy relative distances is extremely important for the empirical calibration of the uncertain metallicity dependence of some standard candles like Cepheid stars, or for studying the galaxy space distribution and peculiar velocities. Here we have investigated the reliability of the widely used I‐band Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) relative distances for a sample of Local Group galaxies with complex star formation histories (SFHs) and age–metallicity relationships (AMRs) namel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar value was also reported by Sakai et al (2000). The cause of this discrepancy is related to the age distribution of the LMC stars and a different metal mixture than in globular clusters from which the above calibration was obtained (Salaris & Girardi 2005).…”
Section: Metallicity Determinationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar value was also reported by Sakai et al (2000). The cause of this discrepancy is related to the age distribution of the LMC stars and a different metal mixture than in globular clusters from which the above calibration was obtained (Salaris & Girardi 2005).…”
Section: Metallicity Determinationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As pointed out by Salaris & Girardi (2005), in the case of the LMC, the photometric calibration leads to a much lower metallicity than the spectroscopic measurements. For our LMC fields, the mean metallicity calculated from the (V -I) color is −1.23 ± 0.07 dex.…”
Section: Metallicity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reason is that in this age range M TRGB As discussed in Barker et al (2004), Salaris & Girardi (2005), Cassisi & Salaris (2013), applying this type of TRGB calibrations to galaxies with a star formation that reaches ages Górski et al (2016). To circumvent this problem it is appropriate to use an M TRGB I − (V − I) TRGB relation, whereby the TRGB colour essentially accounts for the star formation history of the observed population.…”
Section: The Trgb As Distance Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a galaxy such as IC 1613 which has undergone continuous star formation the opposing effects of these population characteristics can make it difficult to interpret any change in the measured TRGB magnitude (Salaris & Girardi 2005), however in conjunction with the derived [Fe/H] abundance below, any variation in the TRGB may help us to better understand the age and metallicity distribution of the giant population in IC 1613.…”
Section: The Trgbmentioning
confidence: 99%