2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-16740-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TinyML: Tools, applications, challenges, and future research directions

Rakhee Kallimani,
Krishna Pai,
Prasoon Raghuwanshi
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the dataset used, the inferiority of KNN and Random Forest in detecting DMI is noticeable, with values of 85% and 90%, approaching false positives. Detecting as many true positives as possible while reducing the number of false positives is crucial [ 16 , 35 , 36 ], as well as understanding the approach of this research in implementing TinyML with TensorFlow Lite on a microcontroller for qualitatively predicting the health status of patients with diabetes mellitus based on ketones related to their BGL, without the need for pre-processing data or the use of the Internet of Things or cloud services [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. The most accurate algorithm is XGBoost due to its superior conversion features to a TensorFlow Lite model, detailed in Section 3.4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the dataset used, the inferiority of KNN and Random Forest in detecting DMI is noticeable, with values of 85% and 90%, approaching false positives. Detecting as many true positives as possible while reducing the number of false positives is crucial [ 16 , 35 , 36 ], as well as understanding the approach of this research in implementing TinyML with TensorFlow Lite on a microcontroller for qualitatively predicting the health status of patients with diabetes mellitus based on ketones related to their BGL, without the need for pre-processing data or the use of the Internet of Things or cloud services [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. The most accurate algorithm is XGBoost due to its superior conversion features to a TensorFlow Lite model, detailed in Section 3.4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the XGBoost model has proven to be the most suitable algorithm for the qualitative detection of low BGL for HI or high levels for DMI, its ability to convert models from different libraries or algorithms to TensorFlow-compatible, and then to TensorFlow Lite models, depends on conversion compatibility [ 55 ]. This poses challenges for algorithms like SVM, KNN, Random Forest, and Decision Tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations