2021
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2020.0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tiny Bodies, Big Needs: Prospective Biobanking of Neonatal Clinical Remnant Samples

Abstract: Repurposing biological samples collected for required diagnostic purposes into suitable biobanking projects is a particularly useful method for enabling research in vulnerable populations. This approach is especially appropriate for the neonate in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), where blood volume reductions can quickly increase beyond minimal risk for adverse events, such as iatrogenic anemia, and proxy consent provided by parents or guardians is required. The method described in this study provides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Translational research in NEC using infant or maternal data, tissue (including stool, breast milk, and others) will be misleading if infant classification is not entirely robust and may go some way to explain variation in study findings related to antecedent feeding practices (33), microbiome findings before "NEC" (11,12) [although these are also highly individual in well infants (34)], the role of CMV in NEC (35,36) and biomarker studies (37-39)-to quote (in relation to calprotectin as a diagnostic test for NEC), "it's not the assay, it's the definition" (40). This may become increasingly important with the development of neonatal biobanks with researchers accessing tissue, milk, stool or blood from infants labelled as NEC or FIP by remote clinicians, and where researchers themselves have no access to high level clinical data (24,(41)(42)(43).…”
Section: Meaning Of the Study: Implications And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translational research in NEC using infant or maternal data, tissue (including stool, breast milk, and others) will be misleading if infant classification is not entirely robust and may go some way to explain variation in study findings related to antecedent feeding practices (33), microbiome findings before "NEC" (11,12) [although these are also highly individual in well infants (34)], the role of CMV in NEC (35,36) and biomarker studies (37-39)-to quote (in relation to calprotectin as a diagnostic test for NEC), "it's not the assay, it's the definition" (40). This may become increasingly important with the development of neonatal biobanks with researchers accessing tissue, milk, stool or blood from infants labelled as NEC or FIP by remote clinicians, and where researchers themselves have no access to high level clinical data (24,(41)(42)(43).…”
Section: Meaning Of the Study: Implications And Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sites that have developed infrastructure for creating a neonatal biobank have described the feasibility of doing so through strengthening relationships between parents and clinical research teams to maintain sample stability between transfer from the clinical laboratory to the biorepository to encourage long-term participation in sample collection. 69 Large scale initiatives, including the integrative human microbiome project, which include prospective sample collection of fetal membranes, amniotic fluid, placenta, and postnatal stool, have the potential to improve our clarity of these dynamic early life events. 70 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed methodology describing participant engagement, consent, and the biobanking process with vulnerable populations is available. 43 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%