2018
DOI: 10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Diskursif dan Pendekatan Konvensional

Abstract: [Title: The Level of Thinking Ability of Students with Metacognitive-Discursive Approaches and Conventional Approaches]. This paper discusses the different levels of thinking ability of students in the classroom using metacognitive-discursive and conventional approaches in SMPK St. Aloysius Weetebula. PISA is one of the tests that measure the level of critical thinking skills. The low PISA results of Indonesian students are caused by the weak ability to solve high-level problem problems, the evaluation system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study indicate that cognitive style affects PST metacognitive awareness on PK and CK indicators related to the ability of knowledge organization to solve problems according to the conditions encountered (Ning, 2016) through monitoring, reflecting, and evaluating problem-solving steps (Lubur & Ate, 2018). This happens because of the characteristics of FD, which often fail to solve detailed problems, while FI is more analytical and detailed in problem-solving (Rastegar & Honarmand, 2016) so that the metacognition of FI students is better than FD (Tinajero et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cognitive Style and Metacognitive Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The results of this study indicate that cognitive style affects PST metacognitive awareness on PK and CK indicators related to the ability of knowledge organization to solve problems according to the conditions encountered (Ning, 2016) through monitoring, reflecting, and evaluating problem-solving steps (Lubur & Ate, 2018). This happens because of the characteristics of FD, which often fail to solve detailed problems, while FI is more analytical and detailed in problem-solving (Rastegar & Honarmand, 2016) so that the metacognition of FI students is better than FD (Tinajero et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cognitive Style and Metacognitive Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Pendekatan ini mengintegrasikan dua aspek penting, yaitu metakognisi dan diskursus. Pendekatan metakognitif bertujuan untuk membantu siswa memahami dan mengontrol proses berpikir siswa, sementara pendekatan diskursif menstimulus interaksi dan diskusi antara siswa untuk memperdalam pemahaman mereka (Ate, 2018;Lubur & Ate, 2018;Moza, 2019;Napu, 2023aNapu, , 2023bRatu & Moza, 2024).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Kegiatan metakognitif mencakup perencanaan, pemantauan dan refleksi. Diskursif sendiri terkait dengan budaya pengajaran yang membangkitkan kegiatan metakognitif peserta didik dalam konteks sosial terutama di kelas yang mempengaruhi proses belajar individu maupun kelompok dari perspektif konstruktivis (Ate, 2018;Lubur & Ate, 2018;Moza, 2019;Napu, 2023aNapu, , 2023bRatu & Moza, 2024). Kadang-kadang di dalam kelas juga terdapat diskursif negatif yang dilakukan oleh siswa maupun guru.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pecahan merupakan salah satu cabang dalam bidang ilmu matematika yang mempelajari tentang bilangan (Cortina et al, 2014;Hackenberg, 2010;Norton, 2019). Pecahan dapat ditemui berdasarkan situasi-situasi dari bagian yang berukuran sama dari yang utuh, keseluruhan atau bagian dari kelompok-kelompok yang beranggotakan sama banyak atau bisa disebut sebagai perbandingan (Ivars et al, 2020;Lubur & Ate, 2018;Tunç-Pekkan, 2015). Operasi bilangan pecahan adalah salah satu materi pada level menengah yang terdiri dari penjumlahan, pengurangan, pembagian dan perkalian (Hackenberg et al, 2021).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified