2016
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of White Matter Development Determines Cognitive Abilities at School Entry but Not in Late Adolescence

Abstract: The primary aim of this study was to investigate to what degree the age-related white matter development, here called "brain age", is associated with working memory (WM) and numeric abilities in 6-year-old children. We measured white matter development using diffusion tensor imaging to calculate fractional anisotropy (FA). A "brain age" model was created using multivariate statistics, which described association between FA and age in a sample of 6- to 20-year-old children. This age model was then applied to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, having advanced brain maturation, which may be considered to be a type of "deviation," is associated with positive outcomes. Previous studies have reported increased cognitive performance for individuals with high brain age, in normative samples [39,108]. Here we found higher brain age is related to reduced ASD severity.…”
Section: Multivariate Brain Maturationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In other words, having advanced brain maturation, which may be considered to be a type of "deviation," is associated with positive outcomes. Previous studies have reported increased cognitive performance for individuals with high brain age, in normative samples [39,108]. Here we found higher brain age is related to reduced ASD severity.…”
Section: Multivariate Brain Maturationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For example, whole‐brain FA from DTI was associated with visuospatial ability, independent of age, in a large sample of primary school‐aged children ( n = 778, age range = 6–10 years; Muetzel et al, ). In another study, DTI indices were used to calculate an estimate of the variability in white matter development—deemed brain age in a cohort of typically developing children, adolescents, and young adults ( n = 82, age range = 6–20 years) (Ullman & Klingberg, ). Brain age predicted working memory and numerical ability in younger children, but not in adolescents and young adults, suggesting that variability in individual developmental timing strongly affects cognition in younger ages (6–11 years), but does not predict adolescent cognitive functioning (Ullman & Klingberg, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, DTI indices were used to calculate an estimate of the variability in white matter development—deemed brain age in a cohort of typically developing children, adolescents, and young adults ( n = 82, age range = 6–20 years) (Ullman & Klingberg, ). Brain age predicted working memory and numerical ability in younger children, but not in adolescents and young adults, suggesting that variability in individual developmental timing strongly affects cognition in younger ages (6–11 years), but does not predict adolescent cognitive functioning (Ullman & Klingberg, ). Finally, a recent MCR study showed that voxel‐wise MWF from within frontal and temporal areas predicted language abilities and that relations became more strongly associated with increasing age in infants and preschool children ( n = 183, age range = 3 months–4 years; O'Muircheartaigh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%