1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00704-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of thromboembolic events after electical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a retrospective analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
78
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Berger and Schweitzer 19 published a retrospective analysis of 4,621 patients undergoing elective DCCV, of whom 88 developed an embolic episode within 7 days and eight additional patients within 18 days. Of these 96 events, only three occurred in patients with duration of atrial fibrillation less than 48 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Berger and Schweitzer 19 published a retrospective analysis of 4,621 patients undergoing elective DCCV, of whom 88 developed an embolic episode within 7 days and eight additional patients within 18 days. Of these 96 events, only three occurred in patients with duration of atrial fibrillation less than 48 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 A small minority were given single-dose periprocedural anticoagulation, but the utility of this practice is unclear. Thromboembolic events from conversion to normal sinus rhythm are known to occur up to 18 days after cardioversion, 19 related to stunning of the left atrial appendage, 26,27 so it is improbable that a single dose of anticoagulant would be protective. Of the 141 patients formally reviewed in our setting, only four were discharged with a documented new prescription for aspirin and three for coumadin, perhaps reflecting the low CHADS 2 score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion has been supported by several other observational studies that found the risk of thromboembolism to be negligible (ranging from 0-0.9%) in patients who undergo cardioversion for AF of <48 hours from symptom onset. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] More recently, the Fin-CV study examined over 3,000 patients with AF of estimated duration <48 hours who were cardioverted by either pharmacological or electrical intervention. 21 They confirmed that overall the risk of cardioverting patients with AF of <48 hours was low (0.7%), with 38 thromboembolic events occurring within 30 days following cardioversion.…”
Section: Risk Of Thromboembolism Following Cardioversionwhere Does Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Early rhythm control has the advantage of faster outcomes, improved symptom control and reduced hospital stay. 30,31 Furthermore, the longer a patient has AF, the more difficult it is to achieve successful cardioversion to sinus rhythm.…”
Section: Is Acute Rhythm Control Worth the Risk?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Оно наиболее выражено непосредственно после кардиоверсии; улуч-шение транспортной функции предсердий обычно происходит в течение нескольких дней, хотя иногда для этого требуется 3-4 нед в зависимости от длительности ФП [82,83]. Известно, что более 80% тромбоэмболий после кардиоверсии регистрируются в первые 3 дня и почти все -в течение 10 дней [84]. С помощью чрес-пищеводной ЭхоКГ подтверждено растворение тром-бов у большинства больных [85].…”
Section: патофизиология тромбообразованияunclassified