2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of the magmatic activity and upper crustal cooling of differentiated asteroid 4 Vesta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were irradiated for 40 h and subsequently analyzed at the Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility (WAAIF) using a MAP 215‐50 Mass Spectrometer equipped with a 10.4 µm CO 2 laser for stepped heating for 60 s, in accordance with Jourdan et al. (2020).…”
Section: Sample Allocation and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were irradiated for 40 h and subsequently analyzed at the Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility (WAAIF) using a MAP 215‐50 Mass Spectrometer equipped with a 10.4 µm CO 2 laser for stepped heating for 60 s, in accordance with Jourdan et al. (2020).…”
Section: Sample Allocation and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to U-Pb and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar results obtained for a larger asteroid such as Vesta, where eucrites from 15 to 20 km depth have been shown to cool down below the closure temperature of 40 Ar in plagioclase ca. 50 to 70 My after accretion (20,21). Therefore, considering the low shock-pressure (5 to 10 GPa) recorded by the ~4.2 Ga particles, the only other two conceivable scenarios that would cause a complete reset of the K/Ar systematics of the two particles involve either 1) a low-impact shock of 5 to 10 GPa in porous rubble pile material where the pressure wave can produce enough work through pore collapse to raise the temperature by few hundred degrees Celsius (13,22,23) or 2) unshocked (cold) particles brought in contact with shockheated material and insulated from space long enough to allow relatively slow cooling over hundred thousand to several millions of years (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the age of the Rheasilvia basin is debated: while the ~1 Ga age was initially based on dynamical simulations and Dawn observations (Marchi et al, 2012) and dynamical ages of the Vesta asteroid family (Marzari et al, 1996(Marzari et al, , 1999Milani et al, 2014), a crater-counting age based on a scaled lunar chronology estimates the basin to have formed ~3.5 Ga ago (Schmedemann et al, 2014). A similarly old age was also inferred from 40 Ar-39 Ar dating of eucrites which were interpreted as samples of rubble pile asteroids that formed from Rheasilvia ejecta (Jourdan et al, 2020;Kennedy et al, 2019). However, recent work by Schenk et al (2022) carefully reexamined the age of the basin and gives a young Rheasilvia event a higher probability than previous studies.…”
Section: Asteroidal Sources: Hed Meteoritesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one HED meteorite, Yamato-74097, has a bulk 40 Ar-39 Ar age between 1.0 and 1.3 Ga (Kaneoka et al, 1979). The old bulk 40 Ar ages of many HED meteorites determined in several studies (Bogard, 2011;Bogard & Garrison, 2003;Cohen, 2013;Jourdan et al, 2020;Kennedy et al, 2019) indicate that their radiogenic Ar clocks did not get reset during the Rheasilvia event, but do not preclude that meteorites were ejected at that time. The lack of impact melt deposits in the Rheasilvia basin indicates that the impact did not produce large amounts of melt and was of normal velocity (Marchi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Asteroidal Sources: Hed Meteoritesmentioning
confidence: 99%