Timing of the formation of the Changba–Lijiagou Pb–Zn ore deposit, Gansu Province, China: Evidence from Rb–Sr isotopic dating of sulfides

Hu, Qiaoqing; Wang, Yitian; Mao, Jingwen; Wei, Ran; Liu, Shengyou; Ye, Dejin; Yuan, Qunhu; Dou, Ping

doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.10.021

Cited by 38 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Rb–Sr isotopic dating of ore sulfides represents a direct way to determine the hydrothermal mineralization age (Nakai et al, ; Nebel et al, ). With the advance of high‐precision mass spectrometry with low detection limit, the technique is now widely applicable in dating hydrothermal minerals (Cao et al, ; Hu et al, ; Yang et al, ) such as sphalerite (Ostendorf et al, ; Rosa et al, ) and pyrite (Yang & Zhou, ; Han et al, ; Li et al, ; Wang et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genesis of Pb–Zn Mineralization Beneath the Xiangshan Uranium Orefield, South China: Constraints from H–O–S–Pb Isotopes and Rb–Sr Dating

Guo

Nie

et al. 2018

Resource Geology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The volcanic‐hosted Xiangshan uranium orefield is the largest uranium deposit in South China. Recent exploration has discovered extensive Pb–Zn mineralization beneath the uranium orebodies. Detailed geological investigation reveals that the major metallic minerals include pyrite, sphalerite, galena, and chalcopyrite, whilst the major non‐metallic minerals include quartz, sericite, and calcite. New δ18Ofluid and δDfluid data indicate that the ore‐forming fluids were mainly derived from magmatic, and the sulfide δ34S values (2.2–6.9‰) suggest a dominantly magmatic sulfur source. The Pb isotope compositions are homogeneous (206Pb/204Pb = 18.120–18.233, 207Pb/204Pb = 15.575–15.698, and 208Pb/204Pb = 37.047–38.446). The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of sulfide minerals range from 0.7197 to 0.7204, which is much higher than volcanic rocks and fall into the range of metamorphic basement. Lead and strontium isotopic compositions indicate that the metallogenic materials probably were derived from metamorphic basement. Pyrite Rb–Sr dating of the ores yielded 131.3 ± 4.0 Ma, indicating that the Pb–Zn mineralization occurred in the Early Cretaceous.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genesis of Pb–Zn Mineralization Beneath the Xiangshan Uranium Orefield, South China: Constraints from H–O–S–Pb Isotopes and Rb–Sr Dating

Guo

Nie

et al. 2018

Resource Geology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1). The Jurassic strata occur mainly to the north of the Rentushan-Jiangluo Fault at the southern edge of the ore cluster, showing faulted contacts with Devonian and Triassic strata, and consisting of breccia-containing sandshale, sandy shale, and fine-grained sandstone (Hu et al, 2015).…”

Section: Geological Settingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The coeval rift-related magmas could have acted as a source for depleted S and C-O isotopic signatures in these carbonate-hosted Zn-Pb deposits, as well as at the Changba deposit. At about 220 Ma (Hu et al, 2015), driven by tectonic and thermal dynamics, the resulting hydrothermal fluids were enriched to ore grade when migrating upwards along regional faults (Fig. 2).…”

Section: Source Of Sulfurmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Genesis of the Changba–Lijiagou Giant Pb‐Zn Deposit, West Qinling, Central China: Constraints from S‐Pb‐C‐O isotopes

Wei

Wang

Mao

et al. 2020

Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The extensive Changba‐Lijiagou Pb‐Zn deposit is located in the north of the Xihe–Chengxian ore cluster in West Qinling. The ore bodies are mainly hosted in the marble, dolomitic marble and biotite‐calcite‐quartz schist of the Middle Devonian Anjiacha Formation, and are structurally controlled by the fault and anticline. The ore‐forming process can be divided into three main stages, based on field geological features and mineral assemblages. The mineral assemblages of hydrothermal stage I are pale‐yellow coarse grain, low Fe sphalerite, pyrite with pits, barite and biotite. The mineral assemblages of hydrothermal stage II are black‐brown cryptocrystalline, high Fe shalerite, pyrite without pits, marcasite or arsenopyrite replace the pyrite with pits, K‐feldspar. The features of hydrothermal stage III are calcite‐quartz‐sulfide vein cutting the laminated, banded ore body. Forty‐two sulfur isotope analyses, twenty‐five lead isotope analyses and nineteen carbon and oxygen isotope analyses were determined on sphalerite, pyrite, galena and calcite. The δ34S values of stage I (20.3 to 29.0‰) are consistent with the δ34S of sulfate (barite) in the stratum. Combined with geological feature, inclusion characteristics and EPMA data, we propose that TSR has played a key role in the formation of the sulfides in stage I. The δ34S values of stage II sphalerite and pyrite (15.1 to 23.0‰) are between sulfides in the host rock, magmatic sulfur and the sulfate (barite) in the stratum. This result suggests that multiple S reservoirs were the sources for S2– in stage II. The δ34S values of stage III (13.1 to 22‰) combined with the structure of the geological and mineral features suggest a magmatic hydrothermal origin of the mineralization. The lead isotope compositions of the sulfides have 206Pb/204Pb ranging from 17.9480 to 17.9782, 207Pb/204Pb ranging from 15.611 to 15.622, and 208Pb/204Pb ranging from 38.1368 to 38.1691 in the three ore‐forming stages. The narrow and symmetric distributions of the lead isotope values reflect homogenization of granite and mantle sources before the Pb‐Zn mineralization. The δ13CPDB and δ18OSMOW values of stage I range from –0.1 to 2.4‰ and from 18.8 to 21.7‰. The values and inclusion data indicate that the source of fluids in stage I was the dissolution of marine carbonate. The δ13CPDB and δ18OSMOW values of stage II range from –4 to 1‰ and from 12.3 to 20.3‰, suggesting multiple C‐O reservoirs in the Changba deposit and the addition of mantle‐source fluid to the system. The values in stage III are –3.1‰ and 19.7‰, respectively. We infer that the process of mineralization involved evaporitic salt and sedimentary organic‐bearing units interacting through thermochemical sulfate reduction through the isotopic, mineralogy and inclusion evidences. Subsequently, the geology feature, mineral assemblages, EPMA data and isotopic values support the conclusion that the ore‐forming hydrothermal fluids were mixed with magmatic hydrothermal fluids and forming the massive dark sphalerite, then yielding th...

show abstract

“…Hydrothermal deposits form over millions of years, whereas hydrothermal mineral assemblages can form within a few hundred thousand years (Hu et al, 2015; Qiu et al, 2016a, b). Therefore, Rb-Sr isochron dating of mineral assemblages is preferred to that of a single mineral (Luo et al, 1998) as indicated by several previous studies (Li et al, 2004b;Tian et al, 2009;Tao et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2014).…”

Section: Age Of the Vein-type Pb-zn-(ag) Mineralizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age and Tectonic Setting of Mesothermal Magmatic Hydrothermal Vein‐Type Pb–Zn–(Ag) Mineralization in the Xiaohongshilazi Deposit, Central Jilin Province, Northeast China

Yang

Ren

et al. 2019

Resource Geology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Xiaohongshilazi deposit located in central Jilin Province, Northeast China, is a newly discovered and medium‐scale Pb–Zn–(Ag) deposit with ore reserves of 34,968 t Pb, 100,150 t Zn, and 158 t Ag. Two‐stage mineralization has been identified in this deposit. Stratiform volcanic‐associated massive sulfide (VMS) Pb–Zn mineralization interbedding with the marine volcanic rocks of the Late Carboniferous–Early Permian Daheshen Formation was controlled by the premineralization E–W‐trending faults. Vein‐type Pb–Zn–(Ag) mineralization occurs within or parallel to the granodiorite and diorite porphyries controlled by the major‐mineralization N–S‐trending faults that cut the stratiform mineralization and volcanic rocks. To constrain the age of vein‐type Pb–Zn–(Ag) mineralization and determine the relationship between mineralization and magmatism, we conducted LA–ICP–MS U–Pb dating on zircon from the ore‐bearing granodiorite and diorite porphyries and Rb–Sr dating on metal sulfide. Granodiorite and diorite porphyries yield zircon U–Pb weighted‐mean 206Pb/238U ages of 203.6 ± 1.8 Ma (Mean Standard Weighted Deviation [MSWD] = 1.8) and 225.6 ± 5.1 Ma (MSWD = 2.3), respectively. Sulfides from four vein‐type ore samples yield a Rb–Sr isochron age of 195 ± 17 Ma (MSWD = 4.0). These results indicate a temporal relationship between the granodiorite porphyry and vein‐type Pb–Zn–(Ag) mineralization. The granodiorite associated with vein‐type mineralization has high SiO2 (68.99–70.49 wt.%) and Na2O (3.9–4.2 wt.%; Na2O/K2O = 1.07–1.10) concentrations, and A/CNK values of 0.95–1.04; consequently, the intrusion is classified as a high‐K, calc‐alkaline, metaluminous I‐type granite. The granodiorite porphyry is enriched in large‐ion lithophile elements (e.g. Rb, Th, U, and K) and light REE and is depleted in high‐field‐strength elements (e.g. Nb, Ta, P, and Ti) and heavy REE, indicating that it represents a subduction‐related rock that formed at an active continental margin. Furthermore, the granodiorite porphyry has Mg# values of 31–34, indicating a lower crustal source. Based on petrological and geochemical features, we infer that the ore‐bearing granodiorite porphyry was derived from the partial melting of the lower crust. In summary, mineralization characteristics, cross‐cutting relationships, geochronological data, and regional tectonic evolution indicate that the region was the site of VMS Pb–Zn mineralization that produced stratiform orebodies within the Late Carboniferous–Early Permian marine volcanic rocks of the Daheshen Formation, followed by mesothermal magmatic hydrothermal vein‐type Pb–Zn–(Ag) mineralization associated with granodiorite porphyry induced by the initial subduction of the Paleo‐Pacific Plate beneath the Eurasia Plate during the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic.

show abstract

Timing of the formation of the Changba–Lijiagou Pb–Zn ore deposit, Gansu Province, China: Evidence from Rb–Sr isotopic dating of sulfides

Cited by 38 publications

References 16 publications

Genesis of Pb–Zn Mineralization Beneath the Xiangshan Uranium Orefield, South China: Constraints from H–O–S–Pb Isotopes and Rb–Sr Dating

Genesis of Pb–Zn Mineralization Beneath the Xiangshan Uranium Orefield, South China: Constraints from H–O–S–Pb Isotopes and Rb–Sr Dating

Genesis of the Changba–Lijiagou Giant Pb‐Zn Deposit, West Qinling, Central China: Constraints from S‐Pb‐C‐O isotopes

Age and Tectonic Setting of Mesothermal Magmatic Hydrothermal Vein‐Type Pb–Zn–(Ag) Mineralization in the Xiaohongshilazi Deposit, Central Jilin Province, Northeast China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About