2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(15)30019-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the timing of surgery for acute fractures remains unclear. Recently, proximal humerus fracture fixation within five days of the fracture event was recommended, since a delayed intervention (six or more days after the injury) is related to a significant increase in complications [21], which is similar to the results of this study. A delayed surgical intervention is thought to complicate the anatomical fracture reduction and increase soft tissue dissection, which may result in a longer fracture union time [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the timing of surgery for acute fractures remains unclear. Recently, proximal humerus fracture fixation within five days of the fracture event was recommended, since a delayed intervention (six or more days after the injury) is related to a significant increase in complications [21], which is similar to the results of this study. A delayed surgical intervention is thought to complicate the anatomical fracture reduction and increase soft tissue dissection, which may result in a longer fracture union time [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Patients who met these criteria were further divided into two groups; an early treatment group (early group), which included patients for whom the time from injury to surgery was within six days, and a delayed treatment group (delayed group), which included patients for whom time to surgery was seven days or more. This cut-off was set based on a previous report on acute proximal humeral fracture for which delayed surgical intervention (six or more days after the injury) was related to a significant increase in postoperative complications [21] because there was no reference describing the timing of surgery for acute distal clavicular fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that delaying the surgical intervention for seven or more days after injury may be associated with an increase in prostoperative complications. Regarding the timing of distal clavicle fracture surgery, postoperative complications have been reported to increase in subjects that undergo surgery more than four weeks after injury [1,21]; however, the timing of surgery for acute fractures remains unclear. Recently, proximal humerus fracture fixation within five days of the fracture event was recommended, since a delayed intervention (six or more days after the injury) is related to a significant increase in complications [21], which is similar to the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who met these criteria were further divided into two groups based on a previous report on the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures; an early treatment group (early group), which included patients for whom the time from injury to surgery was within six days, and a delayed treatment group (delayed group), which included patients for whom time to surgery was seven days or more, according to a previous report on the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures [21].…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If surgery was performed more than 5 days after the accident, an increased risk of complications could be observed [41]. In our population, 57.5% of interventions were conducted during this critical time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%