2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of spawning and predicted fry emergence by naturalized Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in a Lake Huron tributary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SR has the shortest migration distance of ~7 kilometers (km), followed by the CR at ~14 km, and the PR has the longest migration of >100 km. The PR population arrives at their spawning grounds as early as mid‐August, whereas the CR and SR typically arrive in late September (Gerson, Marklevitz, & Morbey, ; M. Thorn, personal observation). Thermal profiles are similar among the rivers, with mean (± SE ) water temperature between mid‐October 2010 and May 2011 of 2.9°C ± 0.30, 2.5°C ± 0.21, and 3.1°C ± 0.23 for the CR, PR, and SR, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SR has the shortest migration distance of ~7 kilometers (km), followed by the CR at ~14 km, and the PR has the longest migration of >100 km. The PR population arrives at their spawning grounds as early as mid‐August, whereas the CR and SR typically arrive in late September (Gerson, Marklevitz, & Morbey, ; M. Thorn, personal observation). Thermal profiles are similar among the rivers, with mean (± SE ) water temperature between mid‐October 2010 and May 2011 of 2.9°C ± 0.30, 2.5°C ± 0.21, and 3.1°C ± 0.23 for the CR, PR, and SR, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results of increasing prespawning movements with arrival date are consistent with density-dependent movement. Moreover, findings of high rates of egg retention and nest superimposition (Gerson et al 2016) provide evidence of active density-dependent mechanisms among females (Kinnison et al 1998;Quinn et al 2007;Schroder et al 2008). In the Sydenham River, the approximately 3.5 km of suitable habitat may simply be too limited given the numbers of returning females (484 in 2010; 536 in 2011), with the best habitat occurring close to the stocking site (sections B and C), for spawning distributions to differ between rearing origins.…”
Section: Spawning Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoreline surveys were not conducted in other areas of the river because the shoreline was not readily accessible. Similar to Gerson et al (2016), 3-min behavioral observations were performed to identify tagged individuals and determine reproductive status (i.e., settled on nest[s] or not). Females were considered to have settled on a nest if nest defense (aggression toward males and other females), digging, or spawning behaviors (egg deposition) were observed.…”
Section: Marklevitz and Morbeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated fecundity for each simulated female from both populations by using a linear model that was fit to the Sydenham River female length and fecundity data collected by Gerson et al. () in 2010 and 2011 (fecundity = [13.906 × female length] − 4,802.239). Random deviations were added to the fecundity predictions by drawing from a normal distribution with a mean of zero and an SD of 1,267.4. Use population‐specific egg mass–in situ survival relationships that were fit by using logistic regression to predict the proportion of eggs that will hatch for each simulated female (Credit River: log[survival/1 − survival] = [0.3938 × egg mass] − [1.5528 × egg mass 2 ] − 1.8162; Sydenham River: log[survival/1 − survival] = [0.6703 × egg mass] − 0.4295).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%