2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Procedure and Compliance With Outpatient Endoscopy Among an Underserved Population in an Inner-City Tertiary Institution

Abstract: Purpose Anecdotal evidence suggests that patient compliance with colonoscopy is poorer with Monday procedures and better during winter months since “there is not much else to do”. We examined patients’ compliance to scheduled out-patient endoscopy by time of the day, days of the week and seasons of the year. Methods We included 2,873 patients who were scheduled for endoscopy from September 2009 to August 2010. Compliant patients were those who showed up for their procedures while non-compliant patients were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
9
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a somewhat lower rate of non-adherence than prior studies, which have reported non-adherence rates ranging from 20 to 42.4 % [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Reasons for the observed non-adherence variation from previous investigations include the heterogeneous evaluation of various types of endoscopic procedures and their indication used in prior studies [5][6][7][8][9][10]14]. Furthermore, adherence in our study was likely higher because we sought to define adherence based on patients already scheduled for their procedure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is a somewhat lower rate of non-adherence than prior studies, which have reported non-adherence rates ranging from 20 to 42.4 % [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Reasons for the observed non-adherence variation from previous investigations include the heterogeneous evaluation of various types of endoscopic procedures and their indication used in prior studies [5][6][7][8][9][10]14]. Furthermore, adherence in our study was likely higher because we sought to define adherence based on patients already scheduled for their procedure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…While numerous demographic, social, and clinical variables have been shown to impact attendance to colonoscopy [5][6][7]15], our findings show that procedure indication is a relevant variable which can easily be assessed without extensive knowledge or data gathering efforts. Our findings could partly be explained by the makeup of these groups, as the screening cohort contained more African-Americans, younger individuals, and more women than the surveillance cohort; previous studies have shown higher non-adherence rates to screening colonoscopy in the aforementioned populations [5][6][7]15]. Likewise, the payer composition may reflect the differing socioeconomic status of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy versus surveillance colonoscopy, as the screening group was comprised of more Medicaid and charity care patients and less Medicare patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations