2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-0182(03)00448-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of mid-Cretaceous carbonate platform depositional cycles, northern Sinai, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Galala Formation was dated as late Cenomanian through early Turonian by Aboul Ela et al (1990a) based on earlier paleontological studies (e.g., Awad and Fawzi, 1956;Fawzi, 1960Fawzi, , 1963Abdou and Fawzi, 1966), whereas Issawi et al (2009) assigned the entire Galala Formation to the Cenomanian in their regional assessment of this formation. Bachmann and Kuss (1998) and Bachmann et al (2003) assigned a late Albian age to the lower part of their Unit B, which appears to be partly equivalent to the lower part of the Galala Formation. They placed the upper Albian-lower Cenomanian boundary and the lower-middle Cenomanian boundary at 145 m and 220 m above the base of their section, respectively, again using a combination of benthic foraminifers, ostracodes, and sequence stratigraphy.…”
Section: Gebel El Minsheramentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Galala Formation was dated as late Cenomanian through early Turonian by Aboul Ela et al (1990a) based on earlier paleontological studies (e.g., Awad and Fawzi, 1956;Fawzi, 1960Fawzi, , 1963Abdou and Fawzi, 1966), whereas Issawi et al (2009) assigned the entire Galala Formation to the Cenomanian in their regional assessment of this formation. Bachmann and Kuss (1998) and Bachmann et al (2003) assigned a late Albian age to the lower part of their Unit B, which appears to be partly equivalent to the lower part of the Galala Formation. They placed the upper Albian-lower Cenomanian boundary and the lower-middle Cenomanian boundary at 145 m and 220 m above the base of their section, respectively, again using a combination of benthic foraminifers, ostracodes, and sequence stratigraphy.…”
Section: Gebel El Minsheramentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The upper part is a white-to yellowish-white, poorly sorted and fractured sandstone. The section depicted by Bachmann and Kuss (1998) and Bachmann et al (2003) was divided into Unit A (,35 m thick) overlain by Unit B ($270 m thick). Their Unit A is delta dominated but has more variable lithology than what we define as the Malha Formation and includes beds of dolomitic limestone; this lithology is difficult to reconcile with our section but presumably reflects lateral variability within this deltaic setting.…”
Section: Gebel El Minsheramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations