2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of glaciation during the last glacial cycle: evaluating the concept of a global ‘Last Glacial Maximum’ (LGM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
158
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 270 publications
8
158
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Scandinavian and British ice sheets reached their maximum extents at 30-25 ka, well before the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) around 21 ka, and were relatively quick to melt (e.g. Sejrup et al, 2009;Carlson & Clark, 2012;Hughes et al, 2013). The explanation for the earlier timing is to be sought in the vicinity of the North Atlantic and its warm currents, and applies to earlier cycles too.…”
Section: Ice Ages and Marine Isotope Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scandinavian and British ice sheets reached their maximum extents at 30-25 ka, well before the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) around 21 ka, and were relatively quick to melt (e.g. Sejrup et al, 2009;Carlson & Clark, 2012;Hughes et al, 2013). The explanation for the earlier timing is to be sought in the vicinity of the North Atlantic and its warm currents, and applies to earlier cycles too.…”
Section: Ice Ages and Marine Isotope Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a PGM sea-level drop of 109 ± 14 m, a PGM EIS volume of 33e53 m SLE , and comparable Antarctic excess ice volume between the PGM and LGM (assuming~17 m SLE as an upper bound, based on geologically constrained glaciological modelling; Table 1), the inferred values imply a North American NAIS volume as small as 59 to 39 m SLE (±14 m SLE ), respectively. A caveat applies with respect to attribution of component contributions to the overall sea-level drop, namely that various indicators for the maximum EIS extent may represent different glacial advance phases at different locations Lambeck et al, 2006;Hughes et al, 2013;Colleoni et al, 2016) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Pgm Ice-volume Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26.5-19 ka; Clark et al, 2009) and Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 2. This is not necessarily surprising: Hughes et al, (2013) suggested that many ice sheets around the world did not achieve maximum extent at the same time during the last glacial cycle (ca. 110-10 ka).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%