2018
DOI: 10.1111/bor.12324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of deglaciation and rock glacier origin in the southeastern Pyrenees: a review and new data

Abstract: The aim of this research is to improve our current understanding of the deglaciation stages in the southeastern Pyrenees and integrate it into reconstructions of the long-term deglaciation in the Iberian mountains since the Last Glaciation. First, we examine the existing chronological data for deglaciation in Iberian mountain ranges, mainly focusing on the Pyrenees and the results derived from cosmic ray exposure dating methods. Then, we recalculate the age of 17 samples from four different areas in the SE Pyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
7
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, we have used the most advanced cosmogenic production rates at present for both isotopes, which are also the most used in the current scientific literature. In addition, the difference in results with the use of other widely used age calculation models is minimal and fits within the uncertainty range, as has been demonstrated in other Iberian mountain ranges (Palacios et al 2017;Andrés et al 2018). The 10 Be and 36 Cl ages are perfectly comparable to each other, as has been shown by the analysis of the two cosmogenic isotopes in the same samples conducted in other Iberian regions (Palacios et al 2017;Andrés et al 2018;Oliva et al 2019), although the rate of uncertainty that contributes to the 36 Cl ages is always greater than the from 10 Be.…”
Section: Surface Exposure Datingsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, we have used the most advanced cosmogenic production rates at present for both isotopes, which are also the most used in the current scientific literature. In addition, the difference in results with the use of other widely used age calculation models is minimal and fits within the uncertainty range, as has been demonstrated in other Iberian mountain ranges (Palacios et al 2017;Andrés et al 2018). The 10 Be and 36 Cl ages are perfectly comparable to each other, as has been shown by the analysis of the two cosmogenic isotopes in the same samples conducted in other Iberian regions (Palacios et al 2017;Andrés et al 2018;Oliva et al 2019), although the rate of uncertainty that contributes to the 36 Cl ages is always greater than the from 10 Be.…”
Section: Surface Exposure Datingsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the latter case, CRE dating indicates that the highest cirques hosted glaciers until 11.5-10.5 ka (Table 1). As temperatures warmed during the Holocene Thermal Maximum (Renssen et al 2009), those glaciers disappeared and paraglacial dynamics occupied the formerly glaciated environments, favouring the development of rock glaciers (Gómez-Ortiz et al 2013b;Oliva et al 2016b;Andrés et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As occurred during the post‐LIA phase in the rock glacier that exists in the Veleta cirque, the formation of permafrost‐related features – including rock glaciers and protalus lobes – must have been conditioned by highly active paraglacial processes, with very unstable rock walls that produced large quantities of sediment, which must have trapped ice that no longer featured glacial dynamics . This process has also been detected in other environments of the Iberian mountains, such as the Central and Eastern Pyrenees . Therefore, this probably means that these were glacier‐derived rock glaciers, suggesting that the elevation boundary for permafrost during the Late Glacial must have been located at ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, there are still many unsolved issues concerning the application of surface exposure dating on rock glaciers, mainly related to: (i) the timing between boulders (i.e. rock glacier) stabilization and permafrost disappearance, (ii) the paleoclimatic significance of rock glacier activity in very active geomorphological settings experiencing paraglacial readjustment (Ballantyne et al, 2009;Palacios et al, 2016Palacios et al, , 2017bAndrés et al, 2018), (iii) the problem of excessive inherited nuclides yielding too old ages (Ivy-Ochs et al, 2009; contrary to the moraines where glacial carving removes the cosmogenic inheritance, and last but not least (iv) the problem related to toppling and/or erosion of boulders that result in too young ages (e.g. Moran et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%