2016
DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2016.1151595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling blockade is critical to improving responses to CTLA-4 based immunotherapy

Abstract: Colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) is produced by a variety of cancers and recruits myeloid cells that suppress antitumor immunity, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs.) Here, we show that both CSF-1 and its receptor (CSF-1R) are frequently expressed in tumors from cancer patients, and that this expression correlates with tumor-infiltration of MDSCs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these tumor-infiltrating MDSCs are highly immunosuppressive but can be reprogrammed toward an antitumor phenotype … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(92 reference statements)
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repolarized TAMs could therefore become efficient antigen-presenting cells activating CD8 and CD4 T cells in situ (21). TAM repolarization strategies include agonistic anti-CD40 (aCD40), blockade of CSF1 signaling, selective inhibition of PI3Kg, deletion of Dicer, as well as targeting surface markers expressed by suppressive macrophages (2,8,16,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Repolarization and depletion have recently been combined to achieve an optimal stimulatory phenotype on macrophages; however, its implication on tumor sensitization to checkpoint inhibitors remains unclear (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repolarized TAMs could therefore become efficient antigen-presenting cells activating CD8 and CD4 T cells in situ (21). TAM repolarization strategies include agonistic anti-CD40 (aCD40), blockade of CSF1 signaling, selective inhibition of PI3Kg, deletion of Dicer, as well as targeting surface markers expressed by suppressive macrophages (2,8,16,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Repolarization and depletion have recently been combined to achieve an optimal stimulatory phenotype on macrophages; however, its implication on tumor sensitization to checkpoint inhibitors remains unclear (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31). Others demonstrated the combined efficacy of anti-CSF1R and either anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4 (32,33). These data provide rationale for clinical trials combining this agent and checkpoint blockade.…”
Section: Pd-(l)1 Inhibitor Nonrespondersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of the Csf1R signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer was associated with decreased TAM and Tregs, reduced tumor progression, and increased T-cell infiltration. An adverse effect was the upregulated expression of checkpoint molecules such as CTLA-4 on T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells, which suggests that a combination with checkpoint inhibitors may be warranted [13,14]. As described for colorectal and pancreatic cancer [2,4], Csf1R blockade induced synergistic effects when combined with other treatment strategies, such as CD40 agonism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%