Timing Isn’t Everything for Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive Results From a Fecal Immunohistochemical Test

Liang, Peter S.; Dominitz, Jason A.

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.011

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In sensitivity analysis including studies using a timeframe within 180 days to define adherence, however, a comparable pooled adherence was obtained for observational studies, suggesting limited effect of the timeframe for colonoscopy in observational screening programs, in which most positive participants would attend colonoscopy follow‐up as soon as possible for early diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, Liang and Dominitz 41 have proposed that, from the population‐health perspective, the proportion of positive individuals attending subsequent colonoscopy is likely to be more important than the timely colonoscopy, particularly in screening programs with suboptimal follow‐up. Therefore, our overall estimates of adherence to colonoscopy regardless of the varied timeframe provide a global overview on the key point in CRC screening.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Huang

Yang

et al. 2022

J of Gastro and Hepatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Author contribution: W. W. designed the search strategy, performed the literature search, extracted and examined the data, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. J. H. devised the search strategy, performed the literature search, provided the statistical suggestions, and revised the manuscript. Y. Y. devised the search strategy, performed the literature search, and extracted and examined the data. S. T. performed the literature search and extracted the data. T.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%