2023
DOI: 10.5334/joc.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing in Conversation

Abstract: Turn-taking in everyday conversation is fast, with median latencies in corpora of conversational speech often reported to be under 300 ms. This seems like magic, given that experimental research on speech planning has shown that speakers need much more time to plan and produce even the shortest of utterances. This paper reviews how language scientists have combined linguistic analyses of conversations and experimental work to understand the skill of swift turn-taking and proposes a tentative solution to the ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 124 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is despite the fact that it takes much longer to plan and produce even short utterances, suggesting that mental processes must overlap (Levinson & Torreira, 2015). Crucially, the speed at which this happens also implies that some type of prediction is taking place: listeners can use a number of cues in the signal to anticipate the end of a turn (see A. S. Meyer (2023) for a review). This appeal to predictive processing is similar to arguments made in the context of speech shadowing, where speakers can repeat speech at speeds -250 milliseconds or less between hearing and repeatingthat strongly suggest a predictive influence from higher-order syntactic, semantic or pragmatic contexts (Chistovich, 1960;Marslen-Wilson, 1973, 1985.…”
Section: Prediction In Speech Perception and Spoken-word Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is despite the fact that it takes much longer to plan and produce even short utterances, suggesting that mental processes must overlap (Levinson & Torreira, 2015). Crucially, the speed at which this happens also implies that some type of prediction is taking place: listeners can use a number of cues in the signal to anticipate the end of a turn (see A. S. Meyer (2023) for a review). This appeal to predictive processing is similar to arguments made in the context of speech shadowing, where speakers can repeat speech at speeds -250 milliseconds or less between hearing and repeatingthat strongly suggest a predictive influence from higher-order syntactic, semantic or pragmatic contexts (Chistovich, 1960;Marslen-Wilson, 1973, 1985.…”
Section: Prediction In Speech Perception and Spoken-word Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%