2000
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0584:talosb>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and Location of Spawning by Nonnative Wild Rainbow Trout and Native Cutthroat Trout in the South Fork Snake River, Idaho, with Implications for Hybridization

Abstract: Our goal was to assess the likelihood of hybridization between introduced rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and native Yellowstone (YS) cutthroat trout O. clarki bouvieri, based upon habitat use and temporal overlap during spawning. We used radio transmitters in 1996 and 1997 to describe the spawning behavior of rainbow trout, hybrids of rainbow trout and YS cutthroat trout, and YS cutthroat trout (1997 only). Fish displayed two distinct spawning strategies, either spawning in side channels of the main stem (9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
92
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of invasive species where contact between species often results in hybridization and introgression due to absent or incompletely evolved reproductive isolation mechanisms (Rhymer and Simberloff 1996), mating is often symmetric. The lack of ecological segregation during spawning between indigenous cutthroat trout and non-indigenous, introduced RBT may explain the symmetric mating pattern reported by many studies (Henderson et al 2000;Rubidge et al 2001;Rubidge and Taylor 2004) including this study. The number of hybrid individuals in the SFSR watershed with RBT versus YCT mtDNA was reflective of the relative proportion of each parental species, suggesting symmetrical hybridization.…”
Section: Levels Of Introgression Hybrid Classes and Yct-genotype Pomentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of invasive species where contact between species often results in hybridization and introgression due to absent or incompletely evolved reproductive isolation mechanisms (Rhymer and Simberloff 1996), mating is often symmetric. The lack of ecological segregation during spawning between indigenous cutthroat trout and non-indigenous, introduced RBT may explain the symmetric mating pattern reported by many studies (Henderson et al 2000;Rubidge et al 2001;Rubidge and Taylor 2004) including this study. The number of hybrid individuals in the SFSR watershed with RBT versus YCT mtDNA was reflective of the relative proportion of each parental species, suggesting symmetrical hybridization.…”
Section: Levels Of Introgression Hybrid Classes and Yct-genotype Pomentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, RBT and YCT evolved in allopatry, and selection for reproductive isolation has likely not been sufficient to prevent interbreeding in the short period since they have been forced into secondary contact as a result of stocking of RBT. Lack of reproductive isolation, coupled with the close phylogenetic relationship between the two species (RBT and YCT are sister taxa; Behnke 1992) and an overlap in spawning seasons (Varley and Gresswell 1988;Henderson et al 2000), has resulted in the two species readily hybridizing and forming fertile hybrid offspring in regions of secondary contact (Loudenslager and Gall 1980;Loudenslager 1981;Kruegar and May 1991). As a popular game fish, RBT have been extensively stocked by fisheries managers into watersheds far outside their native distribution, thereby exacerbating the potential for widespread displacement of native cutthroat trout by RBT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainbow and hybrid trout in the study reach do not differ significantly from each other in spawning behaviour and spawn in mid-May, on average, in the river and lower reaches of tributaries [30]. These characteristics differ significantly from those of cutthroat trout, which spawn in early June, on average, and often in upper reaches of tributaries [30].…”
Section: Study Area and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These characteristics differ significantly from those of cutthroat trout, which spawn in early June, on average, and often in upper reaches of tributaries [30]. Tests of competition show no significant differences in competitive ability and aggression between rainbow and hybrid trout but significantly greater aggression and competitive ability in rainbow and hybrid trout relative to Yellowstone cutthroat trout [70,71].…”
Section: Study Area and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation