2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and climatic drivers for glaciation across semi-arid western Himalayan–Tibetan orogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
191
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
10
191
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OSL samples from the Gumba lacustrine fill (8 ± 2 ka, 8 ± 1 ka, and 10 ± 1 ka) suggested that the maximum extent of the Gumba Glacier occurred~10-8 ka BP. We assign these advances to the early Holocene intensification of the ISM [14,74], which is also supported by radiocarbon dates obtained from peat bog at Chandratal, indicating that the peat growth began 9160 ± 70 years BP [24], thus inferring an increase in either temperature or precipitation in the Lahaul Himalaya during the early Holocene. However, this idea of increased temperatures in the early Holocene times contradicts the idea that this period was a time of extensive glaciation in the Miyar basin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…OSL samples from the Gumba lacustrine fill (8 ± 2 ka, 8 ± 1 ka, and 10 ± 1 ka) suggested that the maximum extent of the Gumba Glacier occurred~10-8 ka BP. We assign these advances to the early Holocene intensification of the ISM [14,74], which is also supported by radiocarbon dates obtained from peat bog at Chandratal, indicating that the peat growth began 9160 ± 70 years BP [24], thus inferring an increase in either temperature or precipitation in the Lahaul Himalaya during the early Holocene. However, this idea of increased temperatures in the early Holocene times contradicts the idea that this period was a time of extensive glaciation in the Miyar basin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Based on the temporal pattern of single deposit scatter and the limited amount of prior exposure in deposits of known deglaciation age, incomplete exposure due to post-glacial geomorphic processes is likely the main factor causing exposure age scatter (Heyman et al, 2011b). This is also in line with the fact that a large part of the Tibetan Plateau region glacial deposits appear to have formed prior to the global last glacial maximum (Schäfer et al, 2002;Owen et al, 2006aOwen et al, , 2006bDortch et al, 2010Dortch et al, , 2013Heyman et al, 2011a;Zech et al, 2013) and Fig. 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The chronological approach used here with χ 2 R and mean/max exposure age tests differs from the kernel density smoothing approach of two recent studies investigating the timing of glaciation across the Tibetan Plateau region (Dortch et al, 2013;Murari et al, 2014). Dortch et al (2013) and Murari et al (2014) defined 19 and 27 regional glacial stages for the western and southern/eastern parts of the Tibetan Plateau region, respectively, ranging up to more than 300 ka in age. Both approaches yield a large number of ages in the 10-30 ka range and considerable variation across the Tibetan Plateau and the surrounding mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Be ages (new and recalculated), Dortch et al (2013) identified 19 regional glacial stages from 311 ± 32 ka to 0.4 ± 0.1 ka and contended that glacial stages older than 21 ka are correlated with a strong monsoon. The unique low-latitude, high-altitude setting of the Himalaya and Trans--Himalaya also allows testing of regional v. global controls of climate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%